On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:47:14 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
<user@example.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:29:13 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>><user@example.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:19:50 -0700 (PDT), Russell Tavek
>>><restaveksanmaman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Unlike you..the pedophiles are quite aware the groups you posted them
>>>>> to is constantly monitored by extensive LEA coalitions...so they are
>>>>> down and arrest you..
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You *do* realize you have committed a serious criminal offence as well
>>>>> as exposing yourself as a moral leper?
>>>>>
>>>>> ..and compounded it with your follow ups?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe not....
>>>>>
>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>If those videos constitute "child pornography," then Lamey is going to
>>>>be in far more trouble than I am, seeing as how he not only posted
>>>>them in the first place but reposted the link to the groups in
>>>>question several times.
>>>
>>>not even a good try..
>>>
>>>It's child stalking plain and simple..calculated to cause
>>>alarm..damage and distress to a child..all because you failed to "win"
>>>an argument with his father..
>>>
>>>pathetic..
>>>
>>>> But then, you and your buddies are probably
>>>>more familiar with pedophile groups than I am. I generally leave
>>>>pedophile-catching to professionals. Of course, so do you and your
>>>>buddies: you just use it as a thin excuse for trolling and gay-
>>>>bashing.
>>>
>>>Forget the gay-bashing...I am not homophobic in the least and sane
>>>homosexuals certainly share the universal horror and disgust at your
>>>criminal activity..
>>>
>>>
>>>The subject is *you* posting videos of a child to known sex offenders
>>>and gloating at the idea of them masturbating over them..
>>>
>>Brandon -- face facts, You Tube is a public place where people post
>>all kinds of videos of their children KNOWING that there are people
>>out there who would enjoy jerking off to them. Lamey knows this,
>>prolly better than most. And yes, it's creepy to think about, but
>>that's the way of the world.
>
>True...but a pedophile stumbling across home video featuring a child
>is one thing..
>
>Legally and morally a psychopath deliberately posting such home
>video..complete with email to pedophiles with the express announced
>intent to distress the family with the thought of sex offenders
>masturbating to their child's image is quite another..
>
>> And I tell you, I'd rather they were at
>>home jerking off at their computers than out trying to rape some kid.
>
>so would most folk but this guy is a walking test case for the new
>felony cyber bullying laws IMHO..
Brandon -- are you totally unaware that people just search over
you-tube for such things anyway? And then post the results of their
search to share with others?
I'll agree with you that I found it to be inappropriate, but not
nearly as over the line as you seem to think. And I hardly think it
qualifies as "bullying!"
-- 4s00th@hushmail.com
If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl
(without showing your email addy)
unless you ask me not to.
|
|