On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:54:35 -0700 (PDT), Usenet Legends bobandcarole
>4s00th wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:54:29 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>> <user@example.net> wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:19:50 -0700 (PDT), Russell Tavek
>> ><restaveksanmaman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>On Jun 18, 3:01?am, Brandon D Cartwright <u...@example.net> wrote:
>> >>> Unlike you..the pedophiles are quite aware the groups you posted them
>> >>> to is constantly monitored by extensive LEA coalitions...so they are
>> >>> probably just idly wondering how long it will take ?them ?to track you
>> >>> down and arrest you..
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>> You *do* realize you have committed a serious criminal offence as well
>> >>> as exposing yourself as a moral leper?
>> >>>
>> >>> ..and compounded it with your follow ups?
>> >>>
>> >>> Maybe not....
>> >>>
>> >>> <shrug>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>If those videos constitute "child pornography," then Lamey is going to
>> >>be in far more trouble than I am, seeing as how he not only posted
>> >>them in the first place but reposted the link to the groups in
>> >>question several times.
>> >
>> >not even a good try..
>> >
>> >It's child stalking plain and simple..calculated to cause
>> >alarm..damage and distress to a child..all because you failed to "win"
>> >an argument with his father..
>> >
>> >pathetic..
>> >
>> >> But then, you and your buddies are probably
>> >>more familiar with pedophile groups than I am. I generally leave
>> >>pedophile-catching to professionals. Of course, so do you and your
>> >>buddies: you just use it as a thin excuse for trolling and gay-
>> >>bashing.
>> >
>> >Forget the gay-bashing...I am not homophobic in the least and sane
>> >homosexuals certainly share the universal horror and disgust at your
>> >criminal activity..
>> >
>> >
>> >The subject is *you* posting videos of a child to known sex offenders
>> >and gloating at the idea of them masturbating over them..
>> >
>> Brandon -- face facts, You Tube is a public place where people post
>> all kinds of videos of their children KNOWING that there are people
>> out there who would enjoy jerking off to them. Lamey knows this,
>> prolly better than most. And yes, it's creepy to think about, but
>> that's the way of the world. And I tell you, I'd rather they were at
>> home jerking off at their computers than out trying to rape some kid.
>
>So you're suggesting he be content that the freaks of nature are
>fondling themselves
>to pictures of his innocent child? You're as sick as he is,
>pedophile.Russell Tavek is
> a piece of dog shit pure and simple. A coward and a pussy. I dare him
>to find MY personal information.
Once again, the bo0b fails to understand: As I clearly stated, it's
creepy to think about such things, turns your stomach a bit. But, at
the same time, it's much better than the alternative.
It's simple -- you don't want animals jerking off to pix of your kids,
don't put them on the Internet for the whole damn world to see.
-- 4s00th@hushmail.com
If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl
(without showing your email addy)
unless you ask me not to.
|
|