Val wrote:
> I think they feel it is not worth it. If ignored the idiots will go away
> with time. If fought, then your playing their game (of needing attention).
> Otherwise post thousands of small nude boy pics to our fav groups.
You're too stupid to realize that posting nude pics of children for
the purposes of sexual excitement in a publicly visible forum will
result in commentary in opposition to such disgusting behavior.
>
> But your outrage is justified. I've been charged with a state felony offense
> of creating a disturbance on the Internet before. So I'm not making a big
> stink over it. Now here is a clue. If I can be charged, try to charge them
> with the same thing. I believe it is considered a 'denial of service' attack
> on the Internet and that is illegal.
What a maroon! You can't give a clue that you do not posess.
>
> Nude pictures of boys (or girls) is protected legal by US Federal law.
You'd suffer much less unfavorable commentary if they were posted
to an appropriate group in the alt.binaries.* hierarchy instead
of these text groups.
--
,,,
.oo
c >
- Soque
|
|