Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!iad.highwinds-media.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.alt.net!fictitious-path
From: nesScitur@husShmail.com (Ronin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Ping 4sooth: regarding "child pornography"
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:59:27 GMT
Message-ID: <496f031c.155843666@127.0.0.1>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 16
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 772927e3.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=Tl1j7l9;<1VZio4aKR`fh\L?0kYOcDh@Z0DHO<GRCaXVKKW@ajDMF;SPCIS_0YjUj_bWG_92V4gM\NQM7:R:@EB[
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:4465
X-No-Archive: yes
The only real objection I see Grownups having to "child pornography"
is that it gives *them* funnytummyfeelings: they carry on about the
"damage it causes to children" only because stating this truth would
amount to admitting to being "paedophiles" themselves.
This being the case, Grownups of course find *all* forms of "child
pornography" -- description no less than depiction, computer graphic
no less than photograph from live action -- objectionable; and the
ongoing debate in this Forum in regards to "damage to children" is
utterly pointless, as it has nothing whatsoever to do with the real
issue.
Ronin
|
|