"Dr.Reality" <james_riske@nothingwillhappen_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cu6m5m$q5m$1@pita.alt.net...
> Tate Gerard wrote:
>> Frank McCoy wrote:
>>
>>> In alt.support.girl-lovers Tate Gerard <tate23@bellsouth.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hey pedo Frank he's got you in the ground on this one, you seem to
>>>> think all adults would find Leann to be sexually attractive thus making
>>>> them pedophiles by definition.
>>>> That is where James has you because I know for certain that Leann is
>>>> definately *not* sexually attractive at all lmao oh god...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Not as she looks NOW.
>>> Look at her *early* pictures and say that; and I'll concede the point.
>>>
>>> Instead of getting prettier and more womanly as she got older, Leann
>>> seems to have just gotten older and uglier. At 13, she had the body
>>> and looks of most women at 21 or older. At 22, she looks past 50 now.
>>>
>>> It's a crying shame, actually. ;-{
>>>
>>> Now my wife at 16-18, was positively ugly. Thank goodness I didn't
>>> meet her until she was in her late (very late) twenties or early
>>> thirties. THEN, she looked almost as good as Leann did at 13, but far
>>> younger.
>>>
>>> The problem is, if you look for pictures of Leann on the web, almost
>>> none exist of her at 13 these days. Almost all are of her as an adult
>>> over 21 ... and she looks positively OLD.
>>>
>>> Some people just mature fast ... and likely age fast too.
>>>
>>> Still, I don't really mean so much to use somebody like Leann as an
>>> example, it's just that she's convenient to find, people know her
>>> name, and recognize her. The people I *really* am referring to, is
>>> the average 14-15 year old teenybopper you meet down at any shopping
>>> mall, dressed in short little tube-top, micro-mini-skirt, bare belly,
>>> and damned little else; flaunting her body at all the boys and any
>>> older man with guts enough to look.
>>>
>>> Such a woman isn't "sexually attractive"?
>>> Give me a break!
>>> Yet, by law, such a woman is so idiotic and mentally immature she
>>> *cannot* give consent to having sex ... even though she's likely done
>>> so quite a few times already. Supposedly the "little baby girl" is so
>>> "innocent" at 15, she doesn't even know what sex really is. Geesh.
>>>
>>> In a large part of the world, that "innocent child" would likely
>>> already be married and have two or three children. She's well past
>>> old enough to give consent to getting married ... but NOT to having
>>> sex without signing her life away. That's supposed to make sense?
>>>
>>
>>
>> I don't think such a girl would be sexually attractive, that is the main
>> flaw in your logic, I am attracted to women in general, not little girls
>> who try to look like women.
>>
>
>
> Yes!
> That is the flaw in pedo Frank's logic, normal humans do not think like
> pedophiles, we are not sexually attracted to minors, pedophiles don't
> understand this simple truth because they left the human race and no
> longer think like humans.
post proof that normal people do not think like paedophiles,
can't do that can you, no paedophile has ever left the human
race you only do that when you die, at least sat6an will welcome
you when you become deceased.
can you tell analist why you were stalking the little brother
of sodapop through the news groups, does analist have to
google the news item and read it herself ????????.
>
>
>
> --
> Dr.Reality aka James Riske
>
>
> "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do
> nothing."--Edmund Burke
>
> "Why have homosexuals lead the majority of hiv infections in America for
> over two decades?"-- Dennis Smith
>
> "America is already heading for the depths of hell, and now they want to
> legalize homosexual marriage?"-- Matthias Schmitt
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|