Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Tate Gerard <tate23@bellsouth.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: pedo Frank McCoy continues to deliberately tell lies on usenet
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 16:37:17 -0500
Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <cu62md$imj$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <dude-40BFE8.21551701022005@28-70.newscene.com> <b4m001t9hu8a2ohuipstllskmsmn2442u9@4ax.com> <ctrnh6$a1v$1@pita.alt.net> <7no201t0k3dhfdi0a0ed80l6shb781cjjd@4ax.com> <ctrq43$glf$2@pita.alt.net> <S5mMd.2924$lw4.700552@news20.bellglobal.com> <t4s401t83tvaqd9d55lsirqlq9qqm5ft4p@4ax.com> <cu38eu$1uj$1@pita.alt.net> <3lca01ta9893h48fpqo8tu7cn68mipnsfv@4ax.com> <cu467v$1em$0@pita.alt.net> <hi9b01tgrrf61eu9kof9hc8p3fj9bihhp4@4ax.com> <cu5j36$j8t$0@pita.alt.net> <novc015h99kgo690ic3ftl0v2vm2c9eu5k@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <novc015h99kgo690ic3ftl0v2vm2c9eu5k@4ax.com>
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:406
Frank McCoy wrote:
> In alt.support.girl-lovers Tate Gerard <tate23@bellsouth.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Hey pedo Frank he's got you in the ground on this one, you seem to think
>> all adults would find Leann to be sexually attractive thus making them
>>pedophiles by definition.
>>That is where James has you because I know for certain that Leann is
>>definately *not* sexually attractive at all lmao oh god...
>
>
> Not as she looks NOW.
> Look at her *early* pictures and say that; and I'll concede the point.
>
> Instead of getting prettier and more womanly as she got older, Leann
> seems to have just gotten older and uglier. At 13, she had the body
> and looks of most women at 21 or older. At 22, she looks past 50 now.
>
> It's a crying shame, actually. ;-{
>
> Now my wife at 16-18, was positively ugly. Thank goodness I didn't
> meet her until she was in her late (very late) twenties or early
> thirties. THEN, she looked almost as good as Leann did at 13, but far
> younger.
>
> The problem is, if you look for pictures of Leann on the web, almost
> none exist of her at 13 these days. Almost all are of her as an adult
> over 21 ... and she looks positively OLD.
>
> Some people just mature fast ... and likely age fast too.
>
> Still, I don't really mean so much to use somebody like Leann as an
> example, it's just that she's convenient to find, people know her
> name, and recognize her. The people I *really* am referring to, is
> the average 14-15 year old teenybopper you meet down at any shopping
> mall, dressed in short little tube-top, micro-mini-skirt, bare belly,
> and damned little else; flaunting her body at all the boys and any
> older man with guts enough to look.
>
> Such a woman isn't "sexually attractive"?
> Give me a break!
> Yet, by law, such a woman is so idiotic and mentally immature she
> *cannot* give consent to having sex ... even though she's likely done
> so quite a few times already. Supposedly the "little baby girl" is so
> "innocent" at 15, she doesn't even know what sex really is. Geesh.
>
> In a large part of the world, that "innocent child" would likely
> already be married and have two or three children. She's well past
> old enough to give consent to getting married ... but NOT to having
> sex without signing her life away. That's supposed to make sense?
>
I don't think such a girl would be sexually attractive, that is the main
flaw in your logic, I am attracted to women in general, not little girls
who try to look like women.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|