On 17 Oct 2008 15:55:02 -0500, +Grant <+Grant@grant.grant> wrote:
>In article <3c2971c8fe45334620fb4f2a0c42a151@pseudo.borked.net>, Borked
>Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>
>> On 15-Oct-2008, NP-f31 <dudewiththe(REMOVE)hair@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > PS- Goodbye (again) lookin *PLONK*
>>
>> ROTFLMAO!
>>
>> Doc, you lost all credibility the night you posted about your
>> sermon on the stairwell, that night you delivered the pizza.
>>
>> You ain't never recovered from *THAT* crap and you just
>> never, ever will, no matter how many "n00bies" you manage
>> to think up in order to prop you up.
>>
>> Incidentally, *this* mikey seems more childlike than the
>> last mikey you thought up. In fact, he's the spittin' image
>> of that "young man" who often posts naughty little pics to
>> try and bring Lookin' down. And *THAT* is something neither
>> you and all of your st00pid pen names put together will
>> ever manage.
>>
>> Your a fake, Doc. You always have been and always will be.
>>
>> Just ask Archie.
>>
>
>Why do you care?
>Everybody is a fake here because we exist in the groups just as words
>on a screen and not real people but you are more fake than most of us
>because you don't even use a individual nic or sign your posts with
>some name. A fake calling a lesser fake a fake is funny. Don't you
>think so?
What is so fake about being my first name is Michael?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 |
|