alt.fan.prettyboyPrev. Next
Re: A Friendly Warning to astraweb users The FoRT
TomBa (nobody@nowhere.com) 2008/09/24 13:30

Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!iad.highwinds-media.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.alt.net!fictitious-path
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: A Friendly Warning to astraweb users
From: TomBa <nobody@nowhere.com>
References: <gapgns$9k7$1@aioe.org> <thi1d4t2edbfd0hl607djijauflrc8phee@4ax.com> <Xns9B1D6AAAB7A0Cutb@208.90.168.18> <8kn3d4tv8njoqvi4f778d817gdc7hntq3s@4ax.com> <Xns9B1E55B79328Butb@208.90.168.18> <pb16d4to8aluovfhfr7fkgntts61b1ksag@4ax.com> <Xns9B1E86ABBD560utb@208.90.168.18> <Xns99B0BABCF6DF4mailmailcom@216.40.28.76> <t9m8d41hbrc8p03icqhgnpvfihgrgmpas1@4ax.com> <f4pfd4lthr81k66pn8qo7oh4p9kv81leu5@4ax.com> <khsgd4t7a3odojh7dcg5hhfkfbk5g3rh7p@4ax.com> <Xns9B229D9E0893Autb@208.90.168.18> <n76jd4hp1n7872m9cjmcsf8njofq0ceokh@4ax.com> <Xns9B239166A64F5utb@208.90.168.18>
Organization: The FoRT
Message-ID: <Xns9B237EDC78B2fort6789@216.151.153.14>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 24 Sep 2008 19:30:32 GMT
Lines: 32
NNTP-Posting-Host: 789a0fa3.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=Ia>:\k@DOn4l=bkA3Hk5C1L?0kYOcDh@:43kK<DVK959BKH8^Wa>LJ>1WnIX1T=Cm1ZdnbRn5ZHe7oWMahiPKe4>
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:3594

Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote in
news:Xns9B239166A64F5utb@208.90.168.18:

>> By the way, what the fuck is "informed consent" anyway.  Is there
>> such a thing as "UNinformed consent" then?  Krist, yer laffable.
>
> If you fail to understand two English words strung together, then
> that's your problem. Basically it means that even if a child could
> consent to anything, do they know the full consequences of what they
> are agreeing to? I guess you would like to see a return of children
> working in coal mines as well, eh?

"Informed consent" originates as a medical term where doctors made known to
patients the benefits and risks of treatment options. The adaption of
"informed consent" to other areas is problematic, especially when the
requirement is to know "the full consequences" of a behavior. That's an
impossible standard to uphold, and lends itself to excuse for prohibition.

Do you know the "full consequences" when driving into town (watch out for
that runaway dump truck!), when you board an airplane (will the wings fall
off?) ... and are these activities avoided because you can't provide
"informed consent" (i.e. knowledge of full consequences)?

Do you expect Pamela Anderson and Brittney Spears to provide "informed
consent" when their images are downloaded and viewed? Surely (don't call me
Shirley) they each are damaged everytime someone looks!

You can't be selective in your application of "informed consent" unless you
are a hypocrite.

--
TomBa NP-f36

Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
30
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite