Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!iad.highwinds-media.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.alt.net!fictitious-path
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: A Friendly Warning to astraweb users
From: TomBa <nobody@nowhere.com>
References: <Xns9B1B5E12D52FAutb@208.90.168.18> <4n6vc457ks6ak7911ue3sjb9n2bprv5k2v@4ax.com> <gapgns$9k7$1@aioe.org> <thi1d4t2edbfd0hl607djijauflrc8phee@4ax.com> <Xns9B1D6AAAB7A0Cutb@208.90.168.18> <8kn3d4tv8njoqvi4f778d817gdc7hntq3s@4ax.com> <Xns9B1E55B79328Butb@208.90.168.18> <pb16d4to8aluovfhfr7fkgntts61b1ksag@4ax.com> <Xns9B1E86ABBD560utb@208.90.168.18> <Xns99B0BABCF6DF4mailmailcom@216.40.28.76> <t9m8d41hbrc8p03icqhgnpvfihgrgmpas1@4ax.com> <f4pfd4lthr81k66pn8qo7oh4p9kv81leu5@4ax.com> <khsgd4t7a3odojh7dcg5hhfkfbk5g3rh7p@4ax.com>
Organization: The FoRT
Message-ID: <Xns9B236FF55395Bfort6789@216.151.153.41>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 24 Sep 2008 18:04:39 GMT
Lines: 187
NNTP-Posting-Host: 49177e65.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=U7ViDFn[dHcJ?XMfTm0i_cL?0kYOcDh@jMFjQ3_9ALVklebG7Y];P?lZ>jEnF8\a@k<@fcg8LGC5kfJ[cQ=XfOnmcT4]YMo4W`k
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:3593
Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
news:khsgd4t7a3odojh7dcg5hhfkfbk5g3rh7p@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:40:50 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:01:19 GMT, Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote:
>>
>>>On 19 Sep 2008 11:23:01 -0500, Jerry <mail@mail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote in news:Xns9B1E86ABBD560utb@
>>>>208.90.168.18:
>>>>
>>>>> Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>>>> news:pb16d4to8aluovfhfr7fkgntts61b1ksag@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:25:35 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>>>><naughtynaughty>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>>>>>>news:8kn3d4tv8njoqvi4f778d817gdc7hntq3s@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:29:09 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>>>><naughtynaughty>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Vlad-The-Impaler <me-again@wombledown.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>news:thi1d4t2edbfd0hl607djijauflrc8phee@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:50:50 +0200 (CEST), jeanpauljesus
>>>>>>>>>> <jeanpauljesus@heaven.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Have to agree with Vlad there.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I'm always amazed how otherwise rational people cannot see
>>>>>>>>>>>that resources devoted to chasing what should be low priority
>>>>>>>>>>>bogies
>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>>resources that cannot be spent on truly high priority issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The reason they cannot see this is because their claims to
>>>>"protect"
>>>>>>>>>>>children in this way are - whether they are aware of this or
>>>>>>>>>>>not, usually not - actually come from their arbitrary
>>>>>>>>>>>morality and
>>>>terror
>>>>>>>>>>>about sex and sexuality, and not so much from rational
>>>>>>>>>>>analysis
>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>actual risks to children, especially in the case of boys.
>>>>>>>>>>>Yet pedophiles are the ones who are supposed to exhibit
>>>>>>>>>>>"cognitive distortion" (!).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>And of course, we have seen research that questions the
>>>>assumptions
>>>>>>>>>>>and claims of the CA industry censured and its authors
>>>>>>>>>>>professionally ostracized - that's where such research isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>outright buried to begin with, that is. Why bother listening
>>>>>>>>>>>to that which you don't agree with?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The assumption that photographing a child nude will "harm"
>>>>children
>>>>>>>>>>>is a case in point. That assumption has been extended by the
>>>>>>>>>>>CA Industry to include a whole range of images that, until a
>>>>>>>>>>>few
>>>>years
>>>>>>>>>>>ago, were never seen as "indecent" at all. It's arbitrary,
>>>>>>>>>>>and entirely culturally determined.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>But you're wasting your time Vlad on NB - he's just a troll
>>>>>>>>>>>and
>>>>just
>>>>>>>>>>>spews whatever. I never read his posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Aye, jpj, he's an ineffectual jackanapes, to be sure.
>>>>inordinately
>>>>>>>>>> impressed with his own inadaquacies, so insignificant that
>>>>>>>>>> his significance no longer signifies A village somewhere has
>>>>>>>>>> clearly mislaid its resident idiot. But amuses me, watching
>>>>>>>>>> him squawking away on his bouncy ball. Does he pass this way
>>>>>>>>>> often, or is he
>>>>just
>>>>>>>>>> out on day release, like?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Vlad
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Still stung that I called you out on snipping this, huh?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"I said you are a bunch of fucking hypocrites who profess to
>>>>>>>>>love
>>>>and
>>>>>>>>>presumably respect boys yet keep posting and downloading their
>>>>>>>>>pics without their informed consent."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gawd, but you're boring.
>>>>>>>> Get a new line. Get a new life.
>>>>>>>> Aren't your "thirty minutes online" up yet?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Get fucked, you lying, impotent limp dick.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What are you upset about? Have you ever stopped to think why you
>>>>>>>are sexually attracted to young boys?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure.
>>>>>> I hate fuckers like you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did as a kid,
>>>>>> And I do now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have a noice day.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a bit sad when you still haven't got over your mistreatment
>>>>> as a
>>>>lad
>>>>> when you are well into your 50's. Is that what makes you scared of
>>>>adult
>>>>> relationships?
>>
>>You know, if that's his attitude, then you'd expect that he has no
>>problem with kiddie-fuckers -- after all, it's sad that they can't get
>>over any mistreatment as a lad. He can't even be consistent in his
>>ignorance!
>>
>>>>another improvised shrink, greaty!
>>>
>>>LOL
>>>
>>>NB seems to think I'm scared of adult relationships.
>>>Seems he thinks fucking women defines a complete adult relationship.
>>>Pretty narrow point of view, ain't it?
>>>How'd ya like to be married to that kind of bloke?
>>>
>>>With all the time he spends in the boy groups, I think he either
>>>ain't gettin' any or he's got some deep-seated psychological issues,
>>>like his uncle diddling him when he was five.
>>>
>>>And he never really got over it.
>>>
>>>Whaddya think?
>>>
>>>Maybe both, eh?
>>>
>>>So tell me NB ... this all just self-righteous outrage, or did
>>>someone slip you one in the bath?
>>>
>>>TnA
>>
>>Now, now, you know his answer -- he'll accuse you of projecting your
>>own experiences on him! It sure is funny how a little knowledge of a
>>simple defense mechanism makes one feel like a shrink!
>>
>>But I have to wonder why you keep playing with him -- we've already
>>proven he's nothing more than a brain-dead bigot who only bothers
>>because he needs to look down on someone to compensate for his own
>>inferiority. He doesn't give a damn about kids -- he just wants to
>>hurt others, and he can't understand why people follow any kind of
>>rules when it's so obvious that no one can enforce those rules on the
>>Internet. He just can't get it into his head that some people choose
>>to do the right thing just because it's the right thing to do (read:
>>moral development of a 5-year-old).
>>
>>So why do you continue to tease someone who's so clearly deficient in
>>intelligence, self-esteem and moral development?
>>
>>-- 4s00th@hushmail.com
>>
>>If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl
>>(without showing your email addy)
>>unless you ask me not to.
>
> Reason?
> Entertainment.
> The same reason kids poke at a mad pitbull through the fence slats.
> Listen to him fly into a frothing fit.
>
> Beats the hell out of the tellie, I can tell you!
>
> TnA
> Law that is Unjust is not Law.
Sometimes this is called 'shooting fish in a barrell' ... the target is
just too tempting!
--
TomBa NP-f36
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 |
|