Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!iad.highwinds-media.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.alt.net!fictitious-path
From: 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: A Friendly Warning to astraweb users
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:19:22 -0400
Message-ID: <s6jid4tg6j1hdp2lnhohti3ua6n0jevaat@4ax.com>
References: <gapgns$9k7$1@aioe.org> <thi1d4t2edbfd0hl607djijauflrc8phee@4ax.com> <Xns9B1D6AAAB7A0Cutb@208.90.168.18> <8kn3d4tv8njoqvi4f778d817gdc7hntq3s@4ax.com> <Xns9B1E55B79328Butb@208.90.168.18> <pb16d4to8aluovfhfr7fkgntts61b1ksag@4ax.com> <Xns9B1E86ABBD560utb@208.90.168.18> <Xns99B0BABCF6DF4mailmailcom@216.40.28.76> <t9m8d41hbrc8p03icqhgnpvfihgrgmpas1@4ax.com> <f4pfd4lthr81k66pn8qo7oh4p9kv81leu5@4ax.com> <khsgd4t7a3odojh7dcg5hhfkfbk5g3rh7p@4ax.com> <Xns9B229D9E0893Autb@208.90.168.18>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1117
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 212
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91436e8c.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=mfI[mXEUGkHPn_2M35M[hOL?0kYOcDh@J^G]EfjQUJ5G>61>=MclH:JkhL]9:0kZ^BEVenH:MN@`O6F?3YZJZOYN
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:3579
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:29:40 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty>
wrote:
>Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>news:khsgd4t7a3odojh7dcg5hhfkfbk5g3rh7p@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:40:50 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:01:19 GMT, Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 19 Sep 2008 11:23:01 -0500, Jerry <mail@mail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote in news:Xns9B1E86ABBD560utb@
>>>>>208.90.168.18:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>>>>> news:pb16d4to8aluovfhfr7fkgntts61b1ksag@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:25:35 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>>>>><naughtynaughty>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>>>>>>>news:8kn3d4tv8njoqvi4f778d817gdc7hntq3s@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:29:09 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>>>>><naughtynaughty>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Vlad-The-Impaler <me-again@wombledown.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>news:thi1d4t2edbfd0hl607djijauflrc8phee@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:50:50 +0200 (CEST), jeanpauljesus
>>>>>>>>>>> <jeanpauljesus@heaven.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Have to agree with Vlad there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>I'm always amazed how otherwise rational people cannot see that
>>>>>>>>>>>>resources devoted to chasing what should be low priority bogies
>>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>>>resources that cannot be spent on truly high priority issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The reason they cannot see this is because their claims to
>>>>>"protect"
>>>>>>>>>>>>children in this way are - whether they are aware of this or
>>>>>>>>>>>>not, usually not - actually come from their arbitrary morality
>>>>>>>>>>>>and
>>>>>terror
>>>>>>>>>>>>about sex and sexuality, and not so much from rational analysis
>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>>actual risks to children, especially in the case of boys. Yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>pedophiles are the ones who are supposed to exhibit "cognitive
>>>>>>>>>>>>distortion" (!).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>And of course, we have seen research that questions the
>>>>>assumptions
>>>>>>>>>>>>and claims of the CA industry censured and its authors
>>>>>>>>>>>>professionally ostracized - that's where such research isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>outright buried to begin with, that is. Why bother listening
>>>>>>>>>>>>to that which you don't agree with?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The assumption that photographing a child nude will "harm"
>>>>>children
>>>>>>>>>>>>is a case in point. That assumption has been extended by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>CA Industry to include a whole range of images that, until a
>>>>>>>>>>>>few
>>>>>years
>>>>>>>>>>>>ago, were never seen as "indecent" at all. It's arbitrary, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>entirely culturally determined.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>But you're wasting your time Vlad on NB - he's just a troll and
>>>>>just
>>>>>>>>>>>>spews whatever. I never read his posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Aye, jpj, he's an ineffectual jackanapes, to be sure.
>>>>>inordinately
>>>>>>>>>>> impressed with his own inadaquacies, so insignificant that his
>>>>>>>>>>> significance no longer signifies A village somewhere has
>>>>>>>>>>> clearly mislaid its resident idiot. But amuses me, watching him
>>>>>>>>>>> squawking away on his bouncy ball. Does he pass this way often,
>>>>>>>>>>> or is he
>>>>>just
>>>>>>>>>>> out on day release, like?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Still stung that I called you out on snipping this, huh?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"I said you are a bunch of fucking hypocrites who profess to love
>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>>>presumably respect boys yet keep posting and downloading their
>>>>>>>>>>pics without their informed consent."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gawd, but you're boring.
>>>>>>>>> Get a new line. Get a new life.
>>>>>>>>> Aren't your "thirty minutes online" up yet?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Get fucked, you lying, impotent limp dick.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>What are you upset about? Have you ever stopped to think why you
>>>>>>>>are sexually attracted to young boys?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure.
>>>>>>> I hate fuckers like you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did as a kid,
>>>>>>> And I do now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have a noice day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a bit sad when you still haven't got over your mistreatment as
>>>>>> a
>>>>>lad
>>>>>> when you are well into your 50's. Is that what makes you scared of
>>>>>adult
>>>>>> relationships?
>>>
>>>You know, if that's his attitude, then you'd expect that he has no
>>>problem with kiddie-fuckers -- after all, it's sad that they can't get
>>>over any mistreatment as a lad. He can't even be consistent in his
>>>ignorance!
>>>
>>>>>another improvised shrink, greaty!
>>>>
>>>>LOL
>>>>
>>>>NB seems to think I'm scared of adult relationships.
>>>>Seems he thinks fucking women defines a complete adult relationship.
>>>>Pretty narrow point of view, ain't it?
>>>>How'd ya like to be married to that kind of bloke?
>>>>
>>>>With all the time he spends in the boy groups, I think he either ain't
>>>>gettin' any or he's got some deep-seated psychological issues, like
>>>>his uncle diddling him when he was five.
>>>>
>>>>And he never really got over it.
>>>>
>>>>Whaddya think?
>>>>
>>>>Maybe both, eh?
>>>>
>>>>So tell me NB ... this all just self-righteous outrage, or did someone
>>>>slip you one in the bath?
>>>>
>>>>TnA
>>>
>>>Now, now, you know his answer -- he'll accuse you of projecting your
>>>own experiences on him! It sure is funny how a little knowledge of a
>>>simple defense mechanism makes one feel like a shrink!
>>>
>>>But I have to wonder why you keep playing with him -- we've already
>>>proven he's nothing more than a brain-dead bigot who only bothers
>>>because he needs to look down on someone to compensate for his own
>>>inferiority. He doesn't give a damn about kids -- he just wants to
>>>hurt others, and he can't understand why people follow any kind of
>>>rules when it's so obvious that no one can enforce those rules on the
>>>Internet. He just can't get it into his head that some people choose
>>>to do the right thing just because it's the right thing to do (read:
>>>moral development of a 5-year-old).
>>>
>>>So why do you continue to tease someone who's so clearly deficient in
>>>intelligence, self-esteem and moral development?
>>>
>>>-- 4s00th@hushmail.com
>>>
>>>If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl
>>>(without showing your email addy)
>>>unless you ask me not to.
>>
>> Reason?
>> Entertainment.
>> The same reason kids poke at a mad pitbull through the fence slats.
>> Listen to him fly into a frothing fit.
>>
>> Beats the hell out of the tellie, I can tell you!
>
>Frothing fit? Is that how you see it? I must watch my prose more
>carefully. All I mean to do is point out the hypocrisy of those who are
>supposed "boylovers", and then post boys pics all over Usenet for
>pedophiles sexual satisfaction without any regard to those boy's feelings.
If that was what you were doing, then I might actually applaud your
efforts -- you have stated a genuine problem in the boy-love
community: those who claim to love, but only serve lust.
Sharing pictures is not so much of a problem -- though I freely admit
that there is no way in hell that _I_ would post pix of someone I love
in a place where those lusters can slaver over them -- well, certainly
not pictures of an intimate nature. But for the most part, we share
pictures here that we've found -- usually on the Internet.
But the truth of the matter is that you do NOT generally point out
such problems -- you spread your hatred and foment more hatred all
based on your own bigoted ideas of what we are and what you think we
do.
Let me ask you, if I didn't love the boys I so admire, what would keep
me from going out and using them as I saw fit? Fear of punishment? We
all know that people who commit crimes believe that they will not get
caught, so the threat of punishment is non-existent. You're right that
there are a lot of people who claim "love" when they actually have no
idea what the word means. But for those of us who do understand -- it
is that very love that you mock that makes us choose to ignore our own
desires and needs.
-- 4s00th@hushmail.com
If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl
(without showing your email addy)
unless you ask me not to.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 |
|