Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
news:khsgd4t7a3odojh7dcg5hhfkfbk5g3rh7p@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:40:50 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:01:19 GMT, Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote:
>>
>>>On 19 Sep 2008 11:23:01 -0500, Jerry <mail@mail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote in news:Xns9B1E86ABBD560utb@
>>>>208.90.168.18:
>>>>
>>>>> Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>>>> news:pb16d4to8aluovfhfr7fkgntts61b1ksag@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:25:35 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>>>><naughtynaughty>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>>>>>>news:8kn3d4tv8njoqvi4f778d817gdc7hntq3s@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:29:09 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>>>><naughtynaughty>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Vlad-The-Impaler <me-again@wombledown.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>news:thi1d4t2edbfd0hl607djijauflrc8phee@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:50:50 +0200 (CEST), jeanpauljesus
>>>>>>>>>> <jeanpauljesus@heaven.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Have to agree with Vlad there.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I'm always amazed how otherwise rational people cannot see that
>>>>>>>>>>>resources devoted to chasing what should be low priority bogies
>>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>>resources that cannot be spent on truly high priority issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The reason they cannot see this is because their claims to
>>>>"protect"
>>>>>>>>>>>children in this way are - whether they are aware of this or
>>>>>>>>>>>not, usually not - actually come from their arbitrary morality
>>>>>>>>>>>and
>>>>terror
>>>>>>>>>>>about sex and sexuality, and not so much from rational analysis
>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>>actual risks to children, especially in the case of boys. Yet
>>>>>>>>>>>pedophiles are the ones who are supposed to exhibit "cognitive
>>>>>>>>>>>distortion" (!).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>And of course, we have seen research that questions the
>>>>assumptions
>>>>>>>>>>>and claims of the CA industry censured and its authors
>>>>>>>>>>>professionally ostracized - that's where such research isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>outright buried to begin with, that is. Why bother listening
>>>>>>>>>>>to that which you don't agree with?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The assumption that photographing a child nude will "harm"
>>>>children
>>>>>>>>>>>is a case in point. That assumption has been extended by the
>>>>>>>>>>>CA Industry to include a whole range of images that, until a
>>>>>>>>>>>few
>>>>years
>>>>>>>>>>>ago, were never seen as "indecent" at all. It's arbitrary, and
>>>>>>>>>>>entirely culturally determined.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>But you're wasting your time Vlad on NB - he's just a troll and
>>>>just
>>>>>>>>>>>spews whatever. I never read his posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Aye, jpj, he's an ineffectual jackanapes, to be sure.
>>>>inordinately
>>>>>>>>>> impressed with his own inadaquacies, so insignificant that his
>>>>>>>>>> significance no longer signifies A village somewhere has
>>>>>>>>>> clearly mislaid its resident idiot. But amuses me, watching him
>>>>>>>>>> squawking away on his bouncy ball. Does he pass this way often,
>>>>>>>>>> or is he
>>>>just
>>>>>>>>>> out on day release, like?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Vlad
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Still stung that I called you out on snipping this, huh?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"I said you are a bunch of fucking hypocrites who profess to love
>>>>and
>>>>>>>>>presumably respect boys yet keep posting and downloading their
>>>>>>>>>pics without their informed consent."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gawd, but you're boring.
>>>>>>>> Get a new line. Get a new life.
>>>>>>>> Aren't your "thirty minutes online" up yet?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Get fucked, you lying, impotent limp dick.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What are you upset about? Have you ever stopped to think why you
>>>>>>>are sexually attracted to young boys?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure.
>>>>>> I hate fuckers like you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did as a kid,
>>>>>> And I do now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have a noice day.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a bit sad when you still haven't got over your mistreatment as
>>>>> a
>>>>lad
>>>>> when you are well into your 50's. Is that what makes you scared of
>>>>adult
>>>>> relationships?
>>
>>You know, if that's his attitude, then you'd expect that he has no
>>problem with kiddie-fuckers -- after all, it's sad that they can't get
>>over any mistreatment as a lad. He can't even be consistent in his
>>ignorance!
>>
>>>>another improvised shrink, greaty!
>>>
>>>LOL
>>>
>>>NB seems to think I'm scared of adult relationships.
>>>Seems he thinks fucking women defines a complete adult relationship.
>>>Pretty narrow point of view, ain't it?
>>>How'd ya like to be married to that kind of bloke?
>>>
>>>With all the time he spends in the boy groups, I think he either ain't
>>>gettin' any or he's got some deep-seated psychological issues, like
>>>his uncle diddling him when he was five.
>>>
>>>And he never really got over it.
>>>
>>>Whaddya think?
>>>
>>>Maybe both, eh?
>>>
>>>So tell me NB ... this all just self-righteous outrage, or did someone
>>>slip you one in the bath?
>>>
>>>TnA
>>
>>Now, now, you know his answer -- he'll accuse you of projecting your
>>own experiences on him! It sure is funny how a little knowledge of a
>>simple defense mechanism makes one feel like a shrink!
>>
>>But I have to wonder why you keep playing with him -- we've already
>>proven he's nothing more than a brain-dead bigot who only bothers
>>because he needs to look down on someone to compensate for his own
>>inferiority. He doesn't give a damn about kids -- he just wants to
>>hurt others, and he can't understand why people follow any kind of
>>rules when it's so obvious that no one can enforce those rules on the
>>Internet. He just can't get it into his head that some people choose
>>to do the right thing just because it's the right thing to do (read:
>>moral development of a 5-year-old).
>>
>>So why do you continue to tease someone who's so clearly deficient in
>>intelligence, self-esteem and moral development?
>>
>>-- 4s00th@hushmail.com
>>
>>If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl
>>(without showing your email addy)
>>unless you ask me not to.
>
> Reason?
> Entertainment.
> The same reason kids poke at a mad pitbull through the fence slats.
> Listen to him fly into a frothing fit.
>
> Beats the hell out of the tellie, I can tell you!
Frothing fit? Is that how you see it? I must watch my prose more
carefully. All I mean to do is point out the hypocrisy of those who are
supposed "boylovers", and then post boys pics all over Usenet for
pedophiles sexual satisfaction without any regard to those boy's feelings.
--
Look at that. The one, the only, the original, the stupid Naughty Boy is
back. Who said Usenet couldn't go further downhill?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 |
|