Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!iad.highwinds-media.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.alt.net!fictitious-path
From: Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: A Friendly Warning to astraweb users
Organization: BLDL
Message-ID: <khsgd4t7a3odojh7dcg5hhfkfbk5g3rh7p@4ax.com>
References: <Xns9B1B5E12D52FAutb@208.90.168.18> <4n6vc457ks6ak7911ue3sjb9n2bprv5k2v@4ax.com> <gapgns$9k7$1@aioe.org> <thi1d4t2edbfd0hl607djijauflrc8phee@4ax.com> <Xns9B1D6AAAB7A0Cutb@208.90.168.18> <8kn3d4tv8njoqvi4f778d817gdc7hntq3s@4ax.com> <Xns9B1E55B79328Butb@208.90.168.18> <pb16d4to8aluovfhfr7fkgntts61b1ksag@4ax.com> <Xns9B1E86ABBD560utb@208.90.168.18> <Xns99B0BABCF6DF4mailmailcom@216.40.28.76> <t9m8d41hbrc8p03icqhgnpvfihgrgmpas1@4ax.com> <f4pfd4lthr81k66pn8qo7oh4p9kv81leu5@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 170
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:33:54 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:3565
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:40:50 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:01:19 GMT, Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote:
>
>>On 19 Sep 2008 11:23:01 -0500, Jerry <mail@mail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote in news:Xns9B1E86ABBD560utb@
>>>208.90.168.18:
>>>
>>>> Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>>> news:pb16d4to8aluovfhfr7fkgntts61b1ksag@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:25:35 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>>><naughtynaughty>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Tedn'Alice@BLDL.com wrote in
>>>>>>news:8kn3d4tv8njoqvi4f778d817gdc7hntq3s@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:29:09 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>>><naughtynaughty>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Vlad-The-Impaler <me-again@wombledown.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>news:thi1d4t2edbfd0hl607djijauflrc8phee@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:50:50 +0200 (CEST), jeanpauljesus
>>>>>>>>> <jeanpauljesus@heaven.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Have to agree with Vlad there.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I'm always amazed how otherwise rational people cannot see that
>>>>>>>>>>resources devoted to chasing what should be low priority bogies
>>>are
>>>>>>>>>>resources that cannot be spent on truly high priority issues.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The reason they cannot see this is because their claims to
>>>"protect"
>>>>>>>>>>children in this way are - whether they are aware of this or not,
>>>>>>>>>>usually not - actually come from their arbitrary morality and
>>>terror
>>>>>>>>>>about sex and sexuality, and not so much from rational analysis
>>>of
>>>>>>>>>>actual risks to children, especially in the case of boys. Yet
>>>>>>>>>>pedophiles are the ones who are supposed to exhibit "cognitive
>>>>>>>>>>distortion" (!).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>And of course, we have seen research that questions the
>>>assumptions
>>>>>>>>>>and claims of the CA industry censured and its authors
>>>>>>>>>>professionally ostracized - that's where such research isn't
>>>>>>>>>>outright buried to begin with, that is. Why bother listening to
>>>>>>>>>>that which you don't agree with?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The assumption that photographing a child nude will "harm"
>>>children
>>>>>>>>>>is a case in point. That assumption has been extended by the CA
>>>>>>>>>>Industry to include a whole range of images that, until a few
>>>years
>>>>>>>>>>ago, were never seen as "indecent" at all. It's arbitrary, and
>>>>>>>>>>entirely culturally determined.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>But you're wasting your time Vlad on NB - he's just a troll and
>>>just
>>>>>>>>>>spews whatever. I never read his posts.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Aye, jpj, he's an ineffectual jackanapes, to be sure.
>>>inordinately
>>>>>>>>> impressed with his own inadaquacies, so insignificant that his
>>>>>>>>> significance no longer signifies A village somewhere has clearly
>>>>>>>>> mislaid its resident idiot. But amuses me, watching him squawking
>>>>>>>>> away on his bouncy ball. Does he pass this way often, or is he
>>>just
>>>>>>>>> out on day release, like?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Vlad
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Still stung that I called you out on snipping this, huh?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"I said you are a bunch of fucking hypocrites who profess to love
>>>and
>>>>>>>>presumably respect boys yet keep posting and downloading their pics
>>>>>>>>without their informed consent."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gawd, but you're boring.
>>>>>>> Get a new line. Get a new life.
>>>>>>> Aren't your "thirty minutes online" up yet?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Get fucked, you lying, impotent limp dick.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What are you upset about? Have you ever stopped to think why you are
>>>>>>sexually attracted to young boys?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure.
>>>>> I hate fuckers like you.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did as a kid,
>>>>> And I do now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have a noice day.
>>>>
>>>> It's a bit sad when you still haven't got over your mistreatment as a
>>>lad
>>>> when you are well into your 50's. Is that what makes you scared of
>>>adult
>>>> relationships?
>
>You know, if that's his attitude, then you'd expect that he has no
>problem with kiddie-fuckers -- after all, it's sad that they can't get
>over any mistreatment as a lad. He can't even be consistent in his
>ignorance!
>
>>>another improvised shrink, greaty!
>>
>>LOL
>>
>>NB seems to think I'm scared of adult relationships.
>>Seems he thinks fucking women defines a complete adult relationship.
>>Pretty narrow point of view, ain't it?
>>How'd ya like to be married to that kind of bloke?
>>
>>With all the time he spends in the boy groups, I think he either ain't
>>gettin' any or he's got some deep-seated psychological issues, like
>>his uncle diddling him when he was five.
>>
>>And he never really got over it.
>>
>>Whaddya think?
>>
>>Maybe both, eh?
>>
>>So tell me NB ... this all just self-righteous outrage, or did someone
>>slip you one in the bath?
>>
>>TnA
>
>Now, now, you know his answer -- he'll accuse you of projecting your
>own experiences on him! It sure is funny how a little knowledge of a
>simple defense mechanism makes one feel like a shrink!
>
>But I have to wonder why you keep playing with him -- we've already
>proven he's nothing more than a brain-dead bigot who only bothers
>because he needs to look down on someone to compensate for his own
>inferiority. He doesn't give a damn about kids -- he just wants to
>hurt others, and he can't understand why people follow any kind of
>rules when it's so obvious that no one can enforce those rules on the
>Internet. He just can't get it into his head that some people choose
>to do the right thing just because it's the right thing to do (read:
>moral development of a 5-year-old).
>
>So why do you continue to tease someone who's so clearly deficient in
>intelligence, self-esteem and moral development?
>
>-- 4s00th@hushmail.com
>
>If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl
>(without showing your email addy)
>unless you ask me not to.
Reason?
Entertainment.
The same reason kids poke at a mad pitbull through the fence slats.
Listen to him fly into a frothing fit.
Beats the hell out of the tellie, I can tell you!
TnA
Law that is Unjust is not Law.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 |
|