Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!iad.highwinds-media.com!feeder.news-service.com!news.alt.net!fictitious-path
From: Jerry <mail@mail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: A Friendly Warning to astraweb users
Followup-To: alt.fan.prettyboy
Date: 22 Sep 2008 14:40:02 -0500
Organization: any
Lines: 120
Message-ID: <Xns9B21DC282BC65mailmailcom@216.40.28.70>
References: <6d241681f61c97a400c5386185f578fa@dizum.com> <0mmtc4pkduo43kebh458o85prc6f7jmeal@4ax.com> <Xns9B1B5E12D52FAutb@208.90.168.18> <4n6vc457ks6ak7911ue3sjb9n2bprv5k2v@4ax.com> <Xns9B1C6341A7FFCutb@208.90.168.18> <Xns9B21B18DD884Autb@208.90.168.18>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Original-Bytes: 5539
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:3559
Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote in
news:Xns9B21B18DD884Autb@208.90.168.18:
> Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote in
> news:Xns9B1C6341A7FFCutb@208.90.168.18:
>
>> Vlad-The-Impaler <me-again@laughter.net> wrote in
>> news:4n6vc457ks6ak7911ue3sjb9n2bprv5k2v@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:14:52 +0000 (UTC), Naughty Boy
>>> <naughtynaughty> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Vlad-The_Impaler <A-Pox-on@trolls.net> wrote in
>>>>news:0mmtc4pkduo43kebh458o85prc6f7jmeal@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So boy-lovers "should be put away BEFORE they molest a child".
>>>>
>>>>I never said that.
>>>>
>>>>You freaks suck and anything you say sucks.
>>>
>>> Ah! NB's talent for informed debate. Run & hide behind hysterical
>>> shibboleths.
>>
>> Ah yes, now we see you are a coward. Let's see what you snipped out
>> of my message:
>>
>> "I said you are a bunch of fucking hypocrites who profess to love and
>> presumably respect boys yet keep posting and downloading their pics
>> without their informed consent."
>>
>> Ah yes. No comment on that I see. What was that about informed
>> debate?
>>
>>
>>>>You won't denounce the trade in pics nor denounce child sex. No
>>>>wonder society hates you.
>>>
>>> Motor cars kill more youngsters & child cyclists than any "pics"
>>> have ever managed. Are you comfortable with that...for THERE is
>>> something REAL to grieve over?
>>>
>>> American carpet bombing has annihilated or mutilated, albeit
>>> unintended, hundreds of thousands of children in Asia & the
>>> Middle-East. THERE is a REAL & much greater cause to grieve over. Or
>>> are you comfortable with that as well?
>>>
>>> Please cease your nauseatingly sanctimonious claptrap. Go out to the
>>> soup kitchens in the slum quarters.......Put your money where your
>>> mouth is.
>>
>> Nice attempt at diversion there. How is it relevant to you so-called
>> "boylovers"? It isn't. And still you won't denounce the trade in pics
>> nor denounce child sex, even when given the opportunity. You freaks
>> suck.
>>
>>
>>>>Go impale yourself, boy hater.
>>>
>>> "Boy hater"????
>>>
>>> What a lame, unsupported & impotent conclusion. I think you should
>>> sack your script-writer.... he's clearly ill-suited for the job.
>>
>> Yes, boyhater. You snipped this because you were so uncomfortable
>> with it:
>>
>> "I said you are a bunch of fucking hypocrites who profess to love and
>> presumably respect boys yet keep posting and downloading their pics
>> without their informed consent."
>>
>> And still you won't denounce the trade in pics nor denounce child
>> sex.
>>
>> No wonder society hates you freaks!
>>
>>
>>
>
> Still no answer from the pedofreaks on this post. No surprise there.
buahahaha, but Naughty-boy, stupid son of a bitch, when did you assume
that we have the obligation to answer an oafish cow like you? We don't
have so much time to waste as you do, probably because we aren't jobless
like you. I see you are trying with psychology now, ahh... then that's
what happens when someone have all the time to spare.
>The point is - if you are a bunch of so-called boylovers,whydo you risk
>damaging boys by posting their pics all over Usenet? You can't say it's
>harmless, because you all refuse to post your own pics, don't you? It's
>the hypocrisy, loser.
awwww, but forgodshake, look at me. Do I have to waste my words in a
soft head like this Naughty-boy? Is honey made for a donkey's taste?
Noo, they say. And nevertheless even a donkey could make keener
questions. But how can a picture, stupid motherfucker, cause damage or
put in risk the life of a boy? Maybe if you throw the printed picture,
spinning and crazy, right to his jugular. But no, I suppose you are not
refeering to that. Then tell me, idiot, when you talk about boys are you
meaning specifically the boys pictured, or perhaps, in more general
terms, that cheeky and ruddy sector of our global population known as
'boys'? Before you answer please you should realize that I don't give a
fuck for whatever you have to opine. Just note this, if it wasn't for
prudish bumpkins like you, every boy, girl, man, dog, or woman pictured
could be very glad of each one of the positive emotions provoked by
their portrays (and between each one of these positive emotions of
course I include each one of the drops of semen spread, pro or against
the wind, with the help of their sweet images) And a question more, but
rhetoric, allways rhetoric. What the fuck makes you think that we don't
post our own pics? Or perhaps you are suggesting, comparing your
intelligence to ours, that we should post them alongside our names and
addresses. It's said and said again: poor idiot you are!
and now that I'm finished with you
greetings from the pedo-anarchic-freak Jerry!
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 |
|