Vlad-The-Impaler <me-again@wombledown.net> wrote in
news:thi1d4t2edbfd0hl607djijauflrc8phee@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:50:50 +0200 (CEST), jeanpauljesus
> <jeanpauljesus@heaven.com> wrote:
>
>>Have to agree with Vlad there.
>>
>>I'm always amazed how otherwise rational people cannot see that resources
>>devoted to chasing what should be low priority bogies are resources that
>>cannot be spent on truly high priority issues.
>>
>>The reason they cannot see this is because their claims to "protect"
>>children in this way are - whether they are aware of this or not, usually
>>not - actually come from their arbitrary morality and terror about sex
>>and sexuality, and not so much from rational analysis of actual risks to
>>children, especially in the case of boys. Yet pedophiles are the ones
>>who are supposed to exhibit "cognitive distortion" (!).
>>
>>And of course, we have seen research that questions the assumptions and
>>claims of the CA industry censured and its authors professionally
>>ostracized - that's where such research isn't outright buried to begin
>>with, that is. Why bother listening to that which you don't agree with?
>>
>>The assumption that photographing a child nude will "harm" children is a
>>case in point. That assumption has been extended by the CA Industry to
>>include a whole range of images that, until a few years ago, were never
>>seen as "indecent" at all. It's arbitrary, and entirely culturally
>>determined.
>>
>>But you're wasting your time Vlad on NB - he's just a troll and just
>>spews whatever. I never read his posts.
>>
>>
> Aye, jpj, he's an ineffectual jackanapes, to be sure. inordinately
> impressed with his own inadaquacies, so insignificant that his
> significance no longer signifies A village somewhere has clearly
> mislaid its resident idiot. But amuses me, watching him squawking away
> on his bouncy ball. Does he pass this way often, or is he just out on
> day release, like?
>
> Vlad
Still stung that I called you out on snipping this, huh?
"I said you are a bunch of fucking hypocrites who profess to love and
presumably respect boys yet keep posting and downloading their pics
without their informed consent."
--
Look at that. The one, the only, the original, the stupid Naughty Boy is
back. Who said Usenet couldn't go further downhill?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 |
|