Naughty Boy <naughtynaughty> wrote in
news:Xns9B1B53DEEBFF2utb@208.90.168.18:
> rikki rockett <baghdad@was-a-blast.com> wrote in
> news:2008091418513916807-baghdad@wasablastcom:
>
>> well, I mean, let's be honest here -- all it takes is one person to
>> recognize your face and then you're beset with the real-world
>> equivalent of trolls like you, plus the ultimate trolling of all when
>> you get stomped out by LEA, whereas most of the pictures circulating
>> around here are:
>>
>> a) from prurient but legal websites or
>> b) ancient
>
> So it is OK to post pictures of boys without their consent, because
> somebody else already did it? Why cotinue the hurt for those boys? You
> are a selfish bunch.
.::::pedo crickets::::.
>> but you probably already know that, since your username, use of
>> quotation marks (to emphasize righteous indignation, of course) and
>> internet tough guy swear words means you probably troll BL's on a
>> regular basis -- that's totally what i would do on a Sunday afternoon,
>> let me tell you
>>
>> On 2008-09-14 15:39:10 -0800, Self Appointed Vigilate <no> said:
>>
>>> +Grant <+Grant@grant.grant> wrote in
>>> news:Grant-me-that-1309081@Grant.Grant:
>>>
>>>>> DO NOT POST -->
>>>>>
>>>>> Pictures:
>>>>> Of yourself. At any age. NEVER NEVER do that.
>>>
>>> Incredible, isn't it? You are a bunch of fucking hypocrites who will
>>> do everything you can to post and download pics of the of boys you all
>>> supposedly "love", yet won't post your own pics for fear of
>>> compromising your "privacy". You bunch of sick fucks. No wonder
>>> everybody hates pedophiles. Nobody believes this "boylover" shit, and
>>> nobody ever will.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Look at that. The one, the only, the original, the stupid Naughty Boy is
back. Who said Usenet couldn't go further downhill?
|
|