rikki rockett <baghdad@was-a-blast.com> wrote in
news:2008091418513916807-baghdad@wasablastcom:
> well, I mean, let's be honest here -- all it takes is one person to
> recognize your face and then you're beset with the real-world
> equivalent of trolls like you, plus the ultimate trolling of all when
> you get stomped out by LEA, whereas most of the pictures circulating
> around here are:
>
> a) from prurient but legal websites or
> b) ancient
So it is OK to post pictures of boys without their consent, because somebody
else already did it? Why cotinue the hurt for those boys? You are a selfish
bunch.
> but you probably already know that, since your username, use of
> quotation marks (to emphasize righteous indignation, of course) and
> internet tough guy swear words means you probably troll BL's on a
> regular basis -- that's totally what i would do on a Sunday afternoon,
> let me tell you
>
> On 2008-09-14 15:39:10 -0800, Self Appointed Vigilate <no> said:
>
>> +Grant <+Grant@grant.grant> wrote in
>> news:Grant-me-that-1309081@Grant.Grant:
>>
>>>> DO NOT POST -->
>>>>
>>>> Pictures:
>>>> Of yourself. At any age. NEVER NEVER do that.
>>
>> Incredible, isn't it? You are a bunch of fucking hypocrites who will do
>> everything you can to post and download pics of the of boys you all
>> supposedly "love", yet won't post your own pics for fear of
>> compromising your "privacy". You bunch of sick fucks. No wonder
>> everybody hates pedophiles. Nobody believes this "boylover" shit, and
>> nobody ever will.
>
>
>
--
Look at that. The one, the only, the original, the stupid Naughty Boy is
back. Who said Usenet couldn't go further downhill?
|
|