In article <342hc41rglrd08u2vddr1o61mgoh4visg6@4ax.com>, 4s00th
<4s00th@hushmail.com> wrote:
> Our Trekkin' Indigenous American had his account with astraweb
> canceled today. They cited specifically that they did not allow
> posting of photographs of any minor-age "model" whether nude or
> clothed. They actually claimed that they would only allow posting of
> photographs when proof of the models' ages were on file.
>
> They were quite wrong to state that he had posted "illegal" pix on the
> group that bears his name, as none of the pix met the USA definition
> of "pornographic" though they were, in fact, all nudes. If I'm not
> mistaken some of these same photos may have been posted by our own T&A
> or VV in naughty-boy. And, yes, according to what our friend stated,
> their contact with him did refer to them as illegal photographs.
>
> Those of you who are also using astraweb -- be careful if you want to
> keep in touch with the fort. I don't think there will be any legal
> problems as a result of this incident, as I stated, the pix where not
> pornographic. But do not automatically assume that further action will
> not be taken in this or future cases.
>
> Watch your asses! It seems missus toffee knees may have shown good
> foresight when he decided that he would no longer post such
> photographs, especially via astraweb.
>
> -- 4s00th@hushmail.com
>
> If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl
> (without showing your email addy)
> unless you ask me not to.
Our former prolific security helper recommended for years that people
don't post BL things with astraweb but just use their account to post
text or download. He couldn't post about why without exposing some fort
members security so people might not have taken that warming seriously
enough. I think your information helps reinforce the recommendation.
Thank you.
--
Grant
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 |
|