4s00th <4s00th@thetruth.com> wrote in
news:5av4035vlaj9a8pn85ggufounidcscanf1@4ax.com:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 04:47:34 +0000 (UTC), El Trauco
> <naughtynaughtynaughty> wrote:
>
>>4s00th <4s00th@thetruth.com> wrote in
>>news:fje2039e6r2qpjdj2qglpmckgonq7ukgbp@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On 20 Mar 2007 21:06:03 -0700, "bob&carole"
>>> <bobandcarole100@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>MARCH 19, 2007
>>>>
>>>>"We've done that because we believe that many of the pedophiles are
>>>>simply incurable."
>>>>
>>>>That says it all...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>SEX offenders released into the community by courts despite attempts
>>>>by the Queensland Government to keep them in jail will have to wear
>>>>electronic monitoring devices.
>>>>
>>>>Premier Peter Beattie said yesterday the Government would request that
>>>>the devices -- plastic bracelets to be worn on the wrist or ankle --
>>>>be ordered as a condition for the release of all prisoners declared
>>>>dangerous sex offenders. The devices are already used in Victoria and
>>>>Western Australia. Four years ago the Beattie Government introduced
>>>>the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders Act) Act 2003, under which
>>>>the Attorney-General can apply to have prisoners due for release
>>>>jailed indefinitely.
>>>>"I don't think it's any secret that my Government has taken a very
>>>>hard line in relation to dangerous sex offenders behind bars," Mr
>>>>Beattie said.
>>>>
>>>>"We've done that because we believe that many of the pedophiles are
>>>>simply incurable."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The Australian
>>>>
>>>>http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,21403679%5E15441%5E%
5En
>>>>bv %5E15306-15319,00.html
>>>
>>> The interesting thing is that idiots and bigots (I know, redundant!)
>>> should think that pedophilia is some kind of disease that needs to be
>>> cured. It is not; it is a statement describing sexual attraction.
>>
>>That's what you freaks want people to believe.
>
> No, that is the truth. I believe it was Max Grrl who pointed out that
> if it were truly a matter of choice, then even YOU would be able to
> consider making that choice to become gay or even a pedophile or a
> zoophile or foot-fetishist or a transvestite or whatever. But you
> can't, can you? Oh, you might consider one or two erotic, but you
> can't change your own sexual orientation to something else just by
> choosing to do so.
>
> Well, maybe not YOU. After all, you've already shown that you have no
> ability to understand how others feel. That kind of makes me suspect
> you have no ability to understand how YOU feel -- although I believe
> you just don't believe it would be worth anything to YOU to try to
> understand how all those "lesser beings" feel.
How about that study you posted? It said molested children were more
likely to become pedophiles. So for some people at least it is learned
behaviour. Or is that study wrong on *some* things?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|