Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Lux <lux_admin@ssl-mail.com>
Subject: Re: The fall of Pat Kelly the pedophile
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.)
Message-Id: <pan.2005.01.09.22.16.24.617405@ssl-mail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
References: <crqhir$2na$0@pita.alt.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 107
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 22:16:43 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.37.17.24
X-Trace: fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk 1105309003 82.37.17.24 (Sun, 09 Jan 2005 22:16:43 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 22:16:43 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:278
> http://www.pedophile.150m.com/
ok.. lets go through this one by one shall we?
>PEDOPHILE
>An adult who is sexually attracted to a child or children
>CHILD MOLESTER
>A man/women who has sex with a boy/girl as a passive partner
>SEX OFFENDER
>Someone who has been convicted of a sex crime
>Some people think that there is a difference in these
>three catagories.
>There is not, so let me explain why!
>1. Pedophile, what happens when a pedophile acts on his/her urge.
>2. Child Molester, is a pedophile who has acted on his/her urge.
>3. Sex Offender, a pedophile who not only acted on his/her urge,
and has been convicted of their crime against children.
Firstly, these definitions are not accurate for the vast majority
to which they refer. While it is true to say that a Pedophile
has sexual attraction to children, it is not true to say that
is the only attraction they have. And being as there are a
plethora of other things (emotions, love / care / dedication to
/adoration of / respect for) that complicate the issue,
it is quite rare that a pedophile acts on his/her urge
in a way that is damaging to a child. Secondly, not all acting
on urges, leads to child sexual abuse, even if all adult/child
sex were harmful, (which it can be proven not to be) - this
is fallacious at best. Simply put, the pedophile
will not "act on his / her urge".. because well, sex with a child
if it will harm them, if you love that child, becomes so
unworth it, and dangerous to the child as to not be negligable.
>It is true to say that Pedophilia is growing epidemic, an
>epidemic that not only affects the
>society we live in.But it affects familys, churchs, and certainly above
>all else Children.
Apart from wishing that this person could spell (e.g. FamilIES)
Pedophilia is not an "epidemic" any more than white people
in africa are. Pedophiles are human beings with the same worth
and right as every other human being.
>Because these Evil men and women have to, for now, hide in the
>shadows.They find other places to congregate, associate, abuse
>and that place is the Internet.
Well, removing the emotive "evil" from this situation,
they have to hide because of low-lifes like the person who
wrote this site, who would take any length to make sure
that their humanity and their rights are not allowed to them.
Who is the evil here?
>Each year thousand of children are lured on the internet by
>these perverts and murders. Yes that right, Murder, because
>for most just molesting isn't enough.
Well, being as you yourself said pedophiles are sexually attracted
to children, and not sociopathic killers by definition surely
then pedophiles are not responsible for murders of children
just because the children are the targets?
Just because a child has been abused, raped, kidnapped or killed
does not mean a pedophile has done it. There are many many
court cases to back this up - which is more than can be said
for your shoddy web page.
But wait folks, this guy gets better!
>Child pornography,Whether it be the "teen" sites out there
> that say "just turned 18"
hmm.. well, that kind of speaks for itself, the intelligence
of this person just blows my mind.
Just to clue the guy in who wrote this drivel:
I don't think its pedophiles who are looking for non-flat chested
non-hairless (unless you count shaven) women mate.. its your
own crew.. the "red blooded male" out there who are.
>Well it's not pornography, if they are dressed.
> Well it is when they website uses
>and abuses the innocent, Children!!!
Erm, again his incompetence (sorry, I mean intelligence)
amazes me - his definition of pornography for example.
It is pornographic if a child is used and abused!
>A prime example a Child Molesters on the Internet, There is a
>website that promotes
>and, tries to Normalize the Sexual Abuse of Children.
I guess he was referring to Logical reality.. check it out
on Archive.org. There are many more sites though that give
valid arguments to a valid cause.
www.puellula.org for instance.
Dare I plug, www.tkgl.net (my own site) too.
haha, thats site is worth a laugh or two anyways:
http://www.pedophile.150m.com/
lmao.
|
|