On 17 Mar 2007 10:46:51 -0700, "bobandcarole"
<bobandcarole666@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Mar 10, 4:11?pm, Tedn'Al...@notellin.com wrote:
>> On 10 Mar 2007 11:28:09 -0800, "bobandcarole"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <bobandcarole1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Mar 10, 9:42?am, 4s00th <4s0...@thetruth.com> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:08:21 -0500, James Riske
>>
>> >> <james.ri...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >+Grant wrote:
>> >> >> In article <opvsb.3v3.1...@news.alt.net>, James Riske
>> >> >> <james.ri...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >>> 4s00th wrote:
>> >> >>>> I lose more respect for you with every post you make. What part of
>> >> >>>> "it's not my place to interfere with their freedom of expression so
>> >> >>>> long as they don't break any laws" did you not understand? In what way
>> >> >>>> is that statement ambiguous? Or are you suggesting that I am somehow
>> >> >>>> "misrepresenting" myself now?
>>
>> >> >>>> 4s00th
>>
>> >> >>> Who gives a damn pedophile, you humiliated yourself many times while
>> >> >>> posting as "::Y-Not::".
>>
>> >> >>> And it sure is fun watching you pretend that nobody knows...
>>
>> >> >> Nobody knows because it isn't true. They aren't the same people. Before
>> >> >> he left Y Not posted to 4s00th a few times and I recently posted a
>> >> >> message from Y Not to 4s00th. Y Not offered to exchange emails with
>> >> >> 4s00th but 4s00th didn't act on the offer. They both work in psychology
>> >> >> so it's normal that they write similar educated things but I can see
>> >> >> that they're different and so can any other intelligent reader. Y Not
>> >> >> doesn't completely agree with everything 4s00th does and says. Y Not
>> >> >> was a teacher and counselor not an attacker. He didn't harass people,
>> >> >> not even trolls, but 4s00th has.
>>
>> >> >Humiliated pedophiles such as "::Y-Not::" aka "4s00th" will often make
>> >> >up new pseudonyms to come to their own rescue when the mean bad "bigots"
>> >> >have exposed them in public for using sockpuppets, hmmm...
>>
>> >> As far as I know, "y-not" claimed that he was not a pedophile. I can
>> >> neither confirm or deny whether he was or not. I, on the other hand,
>> >> have never denied that I am a pedophile. Nor have I ever posted to a
>> >> group under different nom de plumes at the same time. Yes, I used a
>> >> different nom de plume when I posted here between 1997 and 2002, but I
>> >> also posted under my own name and provided a legitimate email address
>> >> where people could write to me.
>>
>> >> As to whether I "harass" anyone, I tend to give back what is given to
>> >> me.
>>
>> >LOL..you aren't capable of harassing anyone, pedophile
>>
>> > If someone wishes to discuss matters intelligently, then I am
>> >> perfectly willing to engage in intellectual discussion.
>>
>> >pedophiles should be watched and monitored...understand?
>>
>> Make that stupid and a fascist.
>
>Because pedophiles disgust me??? LOLOLOL
>The vast majority of the world are "fascists" using
>your flawed pedo logic......
>
>
>
>> Understand?
>>
>> "That which is not just is not law"- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
Took you seven days to think of a reply?
I stand by my statement.
"L"
LOL
"That which is not just is not law"
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 |
|