On Mar 10, 4:11?pm, Tedn'Al...@notellin.com wrote:
> On 10 Mar 2007 11:28:09 -0800, "bobandcarole"
>
>
>
>
>
> <bobandcarole1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 10, 9:42?am, 4s00th <4s0...@thetruth.com> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:08:21 -0500, James Riske
>
> >> <james.ri...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >+Grant wrote:
> >> >> In article <opvsb.3v3.1...@news.alt.net>, James Riske
> >> >> <james.ri...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >>> 4s00th wrote:
> >> >>>> I lose more respect for you with every post you make. What part of
> >> >>>> "it's not my place to interfere with their freedom of expression so
> >> >>>> long as they don't break any laws" did you not understand? In what way
> >> >>>> is that statement ambiguous? Or are you suggesting that I am somehow
> >> >>>> "misrepresenting" myself now?
>
> >> >>>> 4s00th
>
> >> >>> Who gives a damn pedophile, you humiliated yourself many times while
> >> >>> posting as "::Y-Not::".
>
> >> >>> And it sure is fun watching you pretend that nobody knows...
>
> >> >> Nobody knows because it isn't true. They aren't the same people. Before
> >> >> he left Y Not posted to 4s00th a few times and I recently posted a
> >> >> message from Y Not to 4s00th. Y Not offered to exchange emails with
> >> >> 4s00th but 4s00th didn't act on the offer. They both work in psychology
> >> >> so it's normal that they write similar educated things but I can see
> >> >> that they're different and so can any other intelligent reader. Y Not
> >> >> doesn't completely agree with everything 4s00th does and says. Y Not
> >> >> was a teacher and counselor not an attacker. He didn't harass people,
> >> >> not even trolls, but 4s00th has.
>
> >> >Humiliated pedophiles such as "::Y-Not::" aka "4s00th" will often make
> >> >up new pseudonyms to come to their own rescue when the mean bad "bigots"
> >> >have exposed them in public for using sockpuppets, hmmm...
>
> >> As far as I know, "y-not" claimed that he was not a pedophile. I can
> >> neither confirm or deny whether he was or not. I, on the other hand,
> >> have never denied that I am a pedophile. Nor have I ever posted to a
> >> group under different nom de plumes at the same time. Yes, I used a
> >> different nom de plume when I posted here between 1997 and 2002, but I
> >> also posted under my own name and provided a legitimate email address
> >> where people could write to me.
>
> >> As to whether I "harass" anyone, I tend to give back what is given to
> >> me.
>
> >LOL..you aren't capable of harassing anyone, pedophile
>
> > If someone wishes to discuss matters intelligently, then I am
> >> perfectly willing to engage in intellectual discussion.
>
> >pedophiles should be watched and monitored...understand?
>
> Make that stupid and a fascist.
Because pedophiles disgust me??? LOLOLOL
The vast majority of the world are "fascists" using
your flawed pedo logic......
> Understand?
>
> "That which is not just is not law"- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 |
|