Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: 4s00th <4s00th@thetruth.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: Pedo 4s00th used to post as ::Y-Not::
Message-ID: <r8oev250o6g0e544birhvejch44jnrudic@4ax.com>
References: <Grant-me-that-0903071@Grant.Grant> <oq41a.qso.19.1@news.alt.net> <q7f5v29d1m2ccfdge2c9uoro1a0fpnh32k@4ax.com> <Grant-me-that-01003072@Grant.Grant> <sjd8v2diuhlusg9an8j0o9ojfk4k7ia2su@4ax.com> <Grant-me-that-1103071@Grant.Grant> <QQGJh.265046$_X1.68997@fe05.news.easynews.com> <Xns98F36FBB246F1utb@207.14.116.130> <05HJh.297777$k82.7245@fe07.news.easynews.com> <Xns98F374CBD7802utb@207.14.116.130> <ssgev2tqm9t6g04ri5gesodfs3sfi7sgnn@4ax.com> <Xns98F37B9CA93EAutb@207.14.116.130>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1117
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 37
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:43:56 EST
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:43:59 -0400
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:2748
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 01:08:56 +0000 (UTC), El Trauco
<naughtynaughtynaughty> wrote:
>4s00th <4s00th@thetruth.com> wrote in
>news:ssgev2tqm9t6g04ri5gesodfs3sfi7sgnn@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:28:44 +0000 (UTC), El Trauco
>> <naughtynaughtynaughty> wrote:
>>
>>>"-Grunt" <-Grunt@grunt.grunt> wrote in news:05HJh.297777$k82.7245
>>>@fe07.news.easynews.com:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 13-Mar-2007, El Trauco <naughtynaughtynaughty> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wow. That brought a tear to my eye.
>>>>
>>>> I am so glad.
>>>>
>>>> Would you like a peeled onion to wipe it away with?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Would you like a knife to cut your genitals off so you are no longer a
>>>danger to children?
>>
>> Funny that you should assume that Grant is a danger to children -- or
>> are you accusing him of being a pedophile? And I wonder what bigoted
>> reason you're basing such an assumption on?
>
>What are you basing your assumption on that he isn't?
If we are talking about +Grant, perhaps the fact the said he was not
is the criteria I chose to use.
If we're talking about -Grunt ... well, I'm not talking about -Grunt.
4s00th
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 |
|