| Re: It's simple, the Pedophile Beast did it for fun |
http://groups.google.com |
| bobandcarole (bobandcarole222@hotmail.com) |
2006/08/19 05:41 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "bobandcarole" <bobandcarole222@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: It's simple, the Pedophile Beast did it for fun
Date: 19 Aug 2006 04:41:30 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 102
Message-ID: <1155987690.766616.42980@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
References: <1155652842.456556.205820@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
<1155817486.838651.77920@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
<1155857819.508208.89780@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
<1155879810.045793.92530@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 152.163.100.199
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1155987695 18577 127.0.0.1 (19 Aug 2006 11:41:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:41:35 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1155879810.045793.92530@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 7.0; Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 Turboweb [rtc-tc113 8.4.0], HTTP/1.1 cache-rtc-ad05.proxy.aol.com[98A364C7] (Traffic-Server/6.1.1 [uScM])
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=152.163.100.199;
posting-account=8y_KBA0AAAD6oI_1UYadfCUsatFWtsdV
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:1968
bob&carole wrote:
> bob&carole wrote:
> > bob&carole wrote:
> > > bobandcarole~ wrote:
> > > > This really ought to be a no-brainer.
> > > >
> > > > And it would be ... except that we got lawyers and judges involved.
> > > >
> > > > Lawyers and judges are to the simple resolution of human conflict what
> > > > Osama bin Laden is to Muslim/Jewish relations, or what Todd Bertuzzi is
> > > > to good sportsmanship and fair play.
> > > >
> > > > In the wake of the alleged abduction and sex-assault spree attributed
> > > > to convicted pedophile Peter Whitmore, every columnist in the country
> > > > and then some had a kick at this particular can. It takes a lot to
> > > > outrage Canadians.
> > > >
> > > > It was pretty clear the nation was united on this single issue as it
> > > > hasn't been since we stormed the beaches of Normandy.
> > > >
> > > > I figured I'd let it alone. Face it, after you say, "Sexually
> > > > assaulting Canada's children is wrong. Let's put the monsters who do
> > > > this away," you're pretty much done, right?
> > > >
> > > > Apparently not.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In a story from the Sun's Ottawa bureau, Louise Botham, president of
> > > > the Criminal Lawyer's Association, worries in the wake of the Whitmore
> > > > arrest that Crown attorneys are increasingly applying to have criminals
> > > > classed as dangerous offenders, which provides for an indefinite
> > > > sentence.
> > > >
> > > > She also calls it a myth that sexual offenders are disproportionately
> > > > inclined to reoffend, citing a study out of the Warkworth Penitentiary
> > > > that suggested a 13.4% recidivism rate after five years, with rapists
> > > > tending to reoffend more often than child molesters.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone who could utter such a statement -- apparently completely
> > > > unmindful of the moral horror with which normal human beings would
> > > > greet it -- is obviously beyond our assistance and counsel.
> > > >
> > > > But bottom line: If, for every 100 child molesters and rapists we
> > > > release, 13.5 of them claim new innocent victims, destroying the lives
> > > > of kids and women, how about we keep them ALL locked up?
> > > >
> > > > Because those odds suck.
> > > >
> > > > And, let's be clear, those 13.5% who reoffend? Those are the only ones
> > > > dumb enough to get caught more than once. And no sane human believes
> > > > that the first time a child molester monster appears before the bar of
> > > > justice, that it really is a first offence.
> > > >
> > > > There is usually a long line of victims in his wake, victims unavenged.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Whitmore's lawyer, Daniel Brodsky, recently said: "People pay lip
> > > > service to the concept of illness. If you really believe he has an
> > > > illness, then put him in a (hospital) ... don't play games."
> > > >
> > > > Brodsky's the one playing games.
> > > >
> > > > Whitmore doesn't have an illness. Sensible Canadians don't believe
> > > > Whitmore has an illness.
> > > >
> > > > Whitmore just doesn't care about the damage he does to children in
> > > > pursuit of his twisted desires. His is the ultimate selfishness. He is
> > > > a thief of Satanic proportions, stealing the innocence of pre-pubescent
> > > > children who will never forget the monstrousness of his attacks upon
> > > > them.
> > > >
> > > > This week in Calgary, a judge delayed sentencing of a man who sexually
> > > > abused and made child pornography of his daughters and their friends --
> > > > starting when the girls were both about 10 years old.
> > > >
> > > > The judge said an earlier psychiatric assessment following the man's
> > > > guilty pleas didn't address all the issues he considered important.
> > > >
> > > > "There's absolutely nothing said as to the motivation of this accused
> > > > in these offences," he said.
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to respectfully suggest that the vast majority of Canadians
> > > > know the motivation of this series of crimes, even if this judge does
> > > > not.
> > > >
> > > > He did it because he thought it was fun.
> > > >
> > > > People have normal, healthy sex because it's fun. A very few people
> > > > have abnormal, unhealthy sex for the same reason.
> > > >
> > > > Until judges and lawmakers quit using a medical model to deal with
> > > > crime, particularly this kind of heinous sex crime -- poor boy, he must
> > > > be the victim of some brand of mental disorder, he had an unhappy
> > > > childhood, his mom toilet trained him too late -- we will keep
> > > > releasing the Whitmores of this sorry world to claim new victims.
> > > >
> > > > And that is our collective national shame.
> > > >
> > > > Because after Whitmore and all those who have come before him, we know
> > > > better.
|
|
|