On 23 Jul 2013 20:04:35 GMT, "\"C'O'S.M'OS," <where@now.com> wrote:
>Doc NP-f31 wrote in news:htnru8prf8hpdn0t4m81bc2tnlf809qqhj@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:09:53 -0500, Karl <ibyab81@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> You know, for as much as Karl posts in the boy newsgroups, I've NEVER
>> seen any photos attributed to their sites. Are the boys just ugly?
>> Inquiring minds want to know.
>>
>> Doc
>> NP-f31
>>
>> Musing, not amusing.
>>
>
>Well Doc!
>
>I am sure even you would not presume to suggest the little lad you thread
>posted underneath bordered in the remote realms of ugly, ( though he is
>almost certainly over 16)
>Most of the Shota series and their many incarnations tends towards older
>teens as that is the only viable commercial/ legal option these days.
>
>Many of the early shota series had younger models that were very cute,
>and originate I believe from the Philippines, as do the current site
>output.
>I think their scarcity stems from the difficulty to secure and
>considerable expense to buy the sets
>I'll ad them to my post list at some point.
>Cosmos
Hi Cosmos!
No sir, I wasn't calling him ugly. He is a cutie and a fine young lad,
I am sure. I was just wondering if they were ugly and that explained
why I'd never seen a photo from those sites, except the ads that Karl
posts.
I am glad that you have seen them. I am even gladder that you may
eventually post a few shots and I can see for myself the boys that
Karl schills throughout the usenet.
My thanks to you, take care and stay safe,
Doc
NP-f31
|
|
')){kind=link}