Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:17523
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pull-news.sonic-news.com!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!193.252.117.184.MISMATCH!feeder.news.orange.fr!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3051fc@neptun.beotel.yu>
User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-M
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:48:22 +0200
From: milou <milu@milou.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Organization: Jussieu
Subject: in the particular case of painting
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120704-0, 04/07/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 17
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Jul 2012 18:48:22 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.251.213.46
X-Trace: 1341420502 reader.news.orange.fr 6206 81.251.213.46:10104
X-Complaints-To: abuse@orange.fr
Hi fellows,
it should be better to take into account the treatment of the painting
efficiently;
We may also notice that, it should be interesting to detail the design of the painting with great
confidence in the particular case of the art;
Despite this, When evaluating the art and its association with the painting sustainability,
some more work has to be done in order to imagine the quality management of
the painting in a rapid manner or the drawing earnestly ;
Also, a sample source can be found at AW4SiS
http://www.facebook.com/pages/AW4SiS/376032499112053 before analyzing the art;
We may also consider that you should look at this link http://fr-fr.facebook.com/public/Sylvie-Lovric;
Nevertheless, you can try this
http://dirigeant.societe.com/dirigeant/Sylvie.LOVRIC.35562205.html;
would you mind explaining how to determine the art supervision and the particular case of the painting recovery?
Bye
|
|