On 28 Jun 2012 15:50:01 -0500, " +Grant. " <+Grant@grant.grant> wrote:
>In article <fl6pu7ldolon6jqbl0ubrl6erstn1j8qpb@4ax.com>, HMS Victor
>Victorian <victorvictorian@hushunomail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Friends,
>>
>> The latest comment as referenced above, regarding Cosmos' offering,
>> brought up a concern that has pricked at me off and on for better than
>> several years. This is not a criticism of that comment, but I should
>> like your opinion regarding the appropriateness of making comments
>> detailing the contents of encrypted postings.
>>
>> Contributors, including myself, encrypt offerings to avoid negative
>> attention from a variety of sources, ranging from the common troll to
>> the ng service provider, and then to ... well, I'm sure you all fill
>> in the blanks.
>>
>> Those posting appreciation messages always seem to exercise a good
>> amount of discretion. Seldom does one see an ejaculation such as,
>> "OMG. I could suck on that all night!" Still, often comments provide
>> information as to the contents of the post that the poster may not
>> have wanted revealed.
>>
>> How much discretion is called for when posting appreciative comments?
>> Opinions regarding this are appreciated.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> V
>>
>>
>> God Save the Queen.
>> God Bless the Prince of Wales.
>> God Preserve the Windsors.
>> Rule Britannia!
>
>I agree all the way. It's like 'outing'. Some victims could even take
>it as a personal attack to violate their security, like it was done in
>the past. We REALLY don't need to go there again.
>
>I think 'Get' should have read your post.
>
>It's alright if you don't read my stories. Different tastes chew on
>different things.
>
>Should I assume you are going to look in the direction of the Olympic
>men's diving event? Or images thereof? Just a thought.
Dear Grant,
I would if there were a catagory for 8 to 12 year old boys! Until
then, sadly no!
V
|
|