In article <fl6pu7ldolon6jqbl0ubrl6erstn1j8qpb@4ax.com>, HMS Victor
Victorian <victorvictorian@hushunomail.com> wrote:
> Dear Friends,
>
> The latest comment as referenced above, regarding Cosmos' offering,
> brought up a concern that has pricked at me off and on for better than
> several years. This is not a criticism of that comment, but I should
> like your opinion regarding the appropriateness of making comments
> detailing the contents of encrypted postings.
>
> Contributors, including myself, encrypt offerings to avoid negative
> attention from a variety of sources, ranging from the common troll to
> the ng service provider, and then to ... well, I'm sure you all fill
> in the blanks.
>
> Those posting appreciation messages always seem to exercise a good
> amount of discretion. Seldom does one see an ejaculation such as,
> "OMG. I could suck on that all night!" Still, often comments provide
> information as to the contents of the post that the poster may not
> have wanted revealed.
>
> How much discretion is called for when posting appreciative comments?
> Opinions regarding this are appreciated.
>
> Sincerely,
> V
>
>
> God Save the Queen.
> God Bless the Prince of Wales.
> God Preserve the Windsors.
> Rule Britannia!
I agree all the way. It's like 'outing'. Some victims could even take
it as a personal attack to violate their security, like it was done in
the past. We REALLY don't need to go there again.
I think 'Get' should have read your post.
It's alright if you don't read my stories. Different tastes chew on
different things.
Should I assume you are going to look in the direction of the Olympic
men's diving event? Or images thereof? Just a thought.
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Grant
|
|