HMS Victor Victorian <victorvictorian@hushunomail.com> wrote in
news:c06pu7llop2bdnmdo8i63pavg9ikbcks8m@4ax.com:
> On 27 Jun 2012 19:24:42 GMT, "C,0.S-M'OS." <Then@Hezgone.com> wrote:
>
>>HMS Victor Victorian <victorvictorian@hushunomail.com> wrote in
>>news:m2eiu7dsc4rc8dt6hn619v7pdggcn8oc8c@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On 25 Jun 2012 18:49:16 GMT, "C,0.S-M'OS." <Then@Hezgone.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>some older digital fill-"ins"
>>>
>>> Dear Cosmos,
>>>
>>> Good morning to you! Always fine to see you again. I hope your
>>> holiday went well (at least I assume you were on holiday!) You will
>>> find many familiar personages who have heretofore haunted this
>>> establishment have been spending time with tea and cream at The
>>> Galleries. Outside of contributions by Dylan and Chandler and
>>> Grant, it has been uncommonly quiet here.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> V
>>>
>>> God Save the Queen.
>>> God Bless the Prince of Wales.
>>> God Preserve the Windsors.
>>> Rule Britannia!
>>>
>>
>>Greetings Victor.
>>
>>Yes I had noticed it seems very subdued in most of the groups, I am
>>not sure what servers if any still carry this group, apart from astra,
>>I will have a look at the level of this post's response, poor Grant
>>manages to plod forward with his Steven Blog in the face of near zero
>>feedback. I had hoped to use some spare time while on my travels to
>>catch up with his sagas, but alas I had far too much pleasant real
>>life distractions to contend with.
>>Chandler has also remained faithful with his web selections.
>>
>>Did you ever manage to spend some time with the PGP project, it
>>saddens me that we cannot have a more detailed chit chat in our
>>periodic emails, PGP really is very simple programme to get to grip
>>with when used for clip board encrypted snippets
>>
>>Regards
>>Cosmos
>
> Dear Cosmos,
>
> Grant definitely has determination. I should have given up long ago,
> had I absolutely no response regarding my work (and I must apologise
> to Grant here, for I confess I do not read his stories ... but do
> appreciate the effort nonetheless).
>
> Once more, I owe you an apology as well, for I have not taken up the
> PGP project. All that I might say or share, I prefer to do as I have
> done, and in reality view PGP with a good deal of skepticism ...
> fearing it might make me complacent regarding my security ...
> loosening the tongue, as it were. I am sure you find this position
> both strange and frustrating, and that I am either anti-social or
> simply rude. If so, I hope you might forgive my rather embarrassing
> behaviour, and that you might continue writing me, however
> superficially you feel you must write for your own security, either
> here or at my hush address.
>
> Sincerely,
> Victor
>
>
Hi Victor and Grant,
Sorry if my term plodding sounded rather derisory Grant, the intention
was rather some encouragement under adversity.
Victor: regards the merits of PGP its use would merely serve as an
additional wrapper of privacy within hushmail, which you alone would have
control, rather than trusting Hush solely to safeguard your best
interests.
All your other points you mention are entirely valid but you are not in
full control of who can read your mail while hush holds both your public
and private keys that secure your mail
You can still continue to let Hush send your mail just that what you
upload to them for sending would be encrypted and pasted into your email
client by you and under your control
Cosmos
|
|