Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pull-news.sonic-news.com!sa01!sb04!feeder3!feeder.news-service.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!news.glorb.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From: nesScitur@husShmail.com (Ronin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: Have you ever wondered about...
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:12:31 GMT
Message-ID: <4e9ff408.538916879@127.0.0.1>
References: <acmu97pjc3vp2vd9nje71q5gh18cv3r0m5@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 99
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 5d20da4e.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=P?me8:Q0ge]>mgaITZn1@QL?0kYOcDh@ZfPO\0[HPKO]iG8i?S9JJ<U^1JaZ>c_`G[@BGO38UC?<[1:P33jOn12ZQSUD;k_e^<]MY_@FeLP9<Y
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:16217
X-No-Archive: yes
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:19:52 -0400, Doc NP-f31 wrote:
> Hey Fortsters,
> Maybe it's just because I'm built the way I am that makes things like
> this occur to me, but I often wonder about WHY I am a boylover. What
> made me this way? I think I have a pretty good grasp on why I ended up
> a BL and it's because I was molested by my Uncle from the ages of
> 8-14, whcih just happens to be the range of my AOA.
Or, perhaps, it is because the reduction in childhood mortality resulting
from adults paying close attention to juveniles of their species, at ages
when their enthusiasm and curiosity vastly exceed experience and caution,
drives the evolution of that species towards adults who are hard-wired to
pay close attention to juveniles; and that the hard-wiring operates on a
pleasure-of-their-company basis.
Is it perhaps the adults who do *not* "find children attractive" that are
"abnormal"?
After about age 8, a child's grin shows adult upper front teeth, marking
the end of little-kidhood. After about age 14, bone growth changes the
from a child's shallow/light one into an adult's deep/heavy one, and the
skull itself into one in which the eyes, which were about three-quarters
of their adult size at birth, no longer seem *large*; and that marks the
end of perceived kidhood, period: this child no longer requires constant
attention, say all the indicia.
And, as evolution apparently agrees, this is probably so.
The term "molestation" is, shall we say, *unhelpful*: depending on its
user, it might denote anything from mere physical contact to consensual
sexual intercourse -- as well as its base sense of unwelcome intrusion,
physical or otherwise.
(And, in most children's lives, the most unwelcome intrusions are those
of She Who Must Be Obeyed, a figure of enormous Power; one wonders how
much of the -- admittedly rare -- (more-or-less) sexual activity forced
on children by a stranger replays the stranger's childhood experiences,
or is simply the stranger channelling SuperMum.)
How does one describe what is happening to an 8-year-old boy who is --
again -- sitting between the legs of a grownup, belt unbuckled, zipper
unzipped, not resisting what the grownup's hands are -- again -- doing
between *his* legs, not minding -- again -- what actually feels rather
nice, but feeling -- again -- more than a little guilty about letting
him do it and about at least kinda liking it, and on the edge of panic
-- again -- that someone might suddenly come in? Especially his Mum?
Can one argue that his non-resistance amounts to consent? And that he
has not attempted to avoid the grownup after what is happening now has
happened several times previously amounts to informed consent? If so,
what, if anything, does that imply about the boy?
Is the boy being, in any objective sense, harmed? If so, how? And if
not, why not?
Is there anything *wrong*, here? If so, what? And by what standard?
> I know other guys who were just born that way. Maybe there's a lot of
> others who have given the subject some thought. I'd be interested in
> reading about your opinions or suspicions.
If "BL" follows "M", does that make "M" the cause of "BL"? Or is "BL"
the natural state, which would have in any event resulted, and the "M"
a (remembered fondly or otherwise) coincidence?
> Do you remember the first boy you were physcially attracted to?
The term "physical attraction" seems likewise problematic, as one would
hardly expect that a *BL* and his *LB* sitting absolutely motionless on
adjacent air pucks would be drawn together by that notional "force".
It would probably be in any event more precise to speak of "attraction
to the physical form" -- BoyBody -- in which a boy walks around, which
is not the same thing as *attraction to the personality* of what walks
around in that BoyBody -- dh, the Boy: the *hardware*, one might say,
as contrasted with the *software*.
What Boy was ever more loved in The Fort than MTB -- of whose BoyBody
no more is known than it was "ginger-haired"?
> Did you gradually become aware that you were different? Did it hit you
> all at once?
> Please share if you have a mind to,
Indeed; but it would be well to keep in mind that Big Bother [sic]
is watching, and it might be advisable to give him no further cause
to trace your IP address back to your home address ...
> Doc
> NP-f31
Ronin
|
|