Okay, I get it now.
I oppened the first one with the factory boys then got the new "70" and
it worked fine.
What can be said?
Amaaaaazing.
So natural.
Pure reality.
Thank you so much.
On 2011-01-09 02:42:52 -0800, "+C'0.S@-M,O;S'+" <Puss@bootcom> said:
> "Kremlin" <kgb@kremlin.ru> wrote in news:4d297de0$0$11201$c3e8da3
> $cc4fe22d@news.astraweb.com:
>
>> I tried more than 10 times but it's not working for me. I can't
> imagine
>> trying the same thing over and over will have a different result.
>>
>> You used to have a predictable pattern to the pws now it seems to have
>> changed.
>>
>> Was there a new method announced in an encoded text file?
>>
>> Does this pw require knowledge of the name of a photographer?
>>
>> HELP!
>>
> Hi Kremlin
>
> The last Rar was beset with two minor conspiracies,
>
> It should have been numbered 71 Rar!
>
> The text I posted that provides the last simple terminal digits to open
> does not appear to have propagated to some news servers.
>
> My posts here still retain the simplicity of the previous password
> structure.
>
> And the only purpose of PW, is not one of security but avoidance of
> "morrally horified" accidentally opening the post.
>
> Your Cosmos
> Text as follows Terminus is target!
>
> One of my favourite Photographers Andre >>>>>>>>>>>Sujet<<<<<<<<<<<<<
--
|
|