| Re: If you're a boylover, You MUST see this - 1 attachment |
Unlimited download news .. |
| 4s00th (4s00th@hushmail.com) |
2010/11/24 01:01 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!t3!artnm!t4!feeder.news-service.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From: 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: If you're a boylover, You MUST see this - 1 attachment
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 03:01:18 -0500
Message-ID: <mchpe6dvc37ipcunnl7fae12d7p0tcin10@4ax.com>
References: <5qk3e6d066koq1bqoa0dpktd938kgf7m3b@4ax.com> <k5t8e6t0sb6loo1omjr3ha3atn21pasote@4ax.com> <k0dee69u3i5cegrqo89po8rpu5l65ovmn8@4ax.com> <Xns9E36717589A75mailmailmail@127.0.0.1> <ha7me6t25ebr96vd1g5el6jdva85nu3pei@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1117
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 50
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 630d72fc.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=nh]]Z?=Q@][I56`<E^G]B^L?0kYOcDh@ZP`SSoGE?R`S2243=N_<n@P^1JaZ>c_`G[aS?[6L7EhF\SK@5:H?7<lUaeZGlagMoWWf@O7gleO@JP
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:13571
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 21:04:27 -0500, Doc NP-f31 wrote:
>Hello No Pube OOO,
>
>Thank you for sharing your thoughts. A lot of what you say I agree
>with. But you are pretty unapologetic about not loving those children
>you have bedded. It's nice for you that they still love you, I
>suppose. But I find it hard to respect your attitude. I do not judge
>you, who am I to judge? I do not condemn you. I am in no position to
>do such a thing. Butyour words clearly indicate that these
>relationships you've had have been mostly about your own sexual
>gratification.
>
>In my work with boys who have been used by men for sex, I see the
>damage that is left behind. It's not pretty. I am dealing with three
>boys right now who cannot have a relationship with a man one-on-one.
>They don't trust anyone, really except those they can control or pose
>no threat, like younger boys. Having been abused by my Uncle when I
>was eight, I understand how they feel. But that very fact that they
>can't dealwith adults, condemns them to a cycle of acting out on boys,
>unless they choose to break the cycle. I have.
>
>As for your dislike for the term 'boylover', I agree that it is
>insufficient to choose one word as a label to define ourselves. I have
>chosen to use 'boylover' as a way to differentiate myself from those
>who love boys selfishly. I love boys unselfishly. That's the only real
>difference between us, I guess. Except this: I would not choose to
>teach a boy that society's rules don't apply to me. I try to teach my
>boys to recognize injustice and work toward changing unjust rules and
>laws. Which, of course, was the entire point of my original post;
>which was sadly lost on you.
>
>Stay Safe and try to be unselfish,
>
>Doc
>NP-f31
If I may interject doc -- I will not condemn _him_ either, but I damn
well do condemn the way he uses boys for his own selfish wants. And I
think it's horribly sad that he can only love one person at a time --
the heart was made to stretch with each new love that enters your life
-- not eject the others as if there weren't enough room.
Personally, I like the term "boylover" because it reminds me that the
main person is the boy and that the main purpose is to love -- not to
fuck over.
-- 4s00th@hushmail.com
My email is always available for those looking for and willing to supply support in the effort to remain boy-lovers and not become child-molesters de jure if not de facto.
|
|
|