Ultima Thule <PYTHIAS@THULE.COM> found these unused words:
>On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:08:55 -0500, Frank McCoy <mccoyf@millcomm.com>
>wrote:
>
>>I've changed the header, so those of you wanting to ignore this
>>cross-posted idiocy can more easily ignore or kill-file it.
So kind of you ... to SPAM other groups.
>>
>>Usenet Legends bobandcarole ???? ??? <usenetlegends00010@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>One little fuckup will send your OLD ass right back to JAIL
>>>where you belong, shitbag.
>>
>>Since I haven't f*****-up (as you so cutely put it) before,
>>Why then should I be worried about doing so now?
>>
>>That's really like asking a teetotler how much he's worried about
>>being arrested for drunk driving. Only one traffic ticket for
>>speeding 65 in a 55mph zone out in the country with nobody else on the
>>road, over 20 years ago as my only "crime" in over 50 years now.
>>
>>>How did it feel to be exposed as a fucking pervert to your family?
>>
>>Huh? Exposed?
>>
>>My whole family knew what I wrote YEARS before the charges.
>>I no more hid what I wrote from my family than I hid who I was when I
>>posted on Usenet. Why should I?
>
>But that's hardly the point .It wasn't just writings was it?
>
>Your wife was correct when she reported you to the police for
>possessing child pornography wasn't she?
>
>Because you could always have gone to prison,for the rest of your
>natural life,for the depraved pornographic videos of children being
>sexually assaulted and raped by pedophiles that the Justice
>Department's Child Exploitation Division found on your computers?
>
>
>
>
>>Some didn't *like* what I wrote; but no more think the government
>>should have a say in what I write than they think the government
>>should have a say in who I (or they) vote for.
>>
>>I think my mother's comment is about typical:
>>"If you can write this good in THIS subject, then why don't you write
>>mainstream fiction and earn good money for it?" She liked the
>>*quality* of my writing; but deplored the subject-matter.
>
>Are you saying your mother read your pedophile trash?
>
>>So ... She
>>thought my talents were being wasted.
>>
>>I valued my mother's opinions.
>>Sadly, she died while only 93 years young.
>>
>>As to being a "pervert":
>>If what other people THINK is any rule in the matter and people took a
>>vote; I'm pretty sure I'd lose hands-down to you on the pervert-scale.
>>
>>Yes, I *might* possibly get about between 60% and 80% votes as a
>>"pervert" for what I write and have-posted in the past. Nobody can
>>please everybody; and to somebody somewhere just about anybody could
>>be labeled a "pervert". The line changes from day to day; not just
>>decade to decade. Much of what is considered "perverted" NOW wasn't
>>fifty years ago ... and vice-versa.
>
>Fathers' getting children to drink their sperm,one repetitive theme
>of yours, for example, has always been considered perverted in every
>age and every culture.
>
>And it always will induce shock ,horror,disgust and loathing in all
>sane decent folk.
>
>>You? I suspect about 95% to 98% would vote YOU as the bigger pervert.
>
>Projection is a wonderful thing.
>
>Unlike you, there isn't a shred of evidence that Bob is anything but a
>happily married man who hates pedophiles and child molesters,as anyone
>with even a tad of decency and self-respect should.
>
>>That's from the responses I see to all your self-aggrandizing posts.
>>Versus mine.
>
>Responses from fellow child pornographers and pedofucks -
>homosexual,heterosexual or incestuous,don't count.
>
>>And yet: I was going to say that, your own label as "Usenet Legends
>>bobandcarole" just showed, "That you were a legend in your own mind,"
>>and ONLY there; when I actually gave the issue some thought.
>>
>>Your obsession with ass-fucking is already legendary, all by itself.
>>
>>Yes, you truly ARE a "Usenet Legend" ... As about the third or fourth
>>biggest asshole, idiot, and troll in Usenet History. Yes, there ARE
>>worse. Keep trying though: You might make top spot yet!
>>
>>I may or may-not respond to anything you say. Probably not though.
>>This part of this post seemed humorous enough to warrant a reply.
|
|