On 10 Oct 2010 08:02:01 -0500, Charles Calthrop <chacal@th.com> wrote:
>NP-f31 wrote in news:0hqha696gge077v2q7lacbofner2qeskd6@4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:43:42 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous
>> <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Hairy Dude, this boy wrote to you in one of these forums, asking your
>>>help in participating more fully in what they had to offer. Two months
>>>later, my Hushmail Inbox is still empty of your reply.
>>
>> Hello M.O.
>>
>> Never saw it apparently. Typically the only time you post is to
>> complain about me. Sorry you don't have something more contructive to
>> occupy your time.
>
>
> Hehe, yet again my loving pair of fellas reunite, what a joy to see you
>here, Dog the shepard, and Mob the lost child!
> But my dear Mob, don't you get tired of chewing one more time the same
>rotten bite? Yes or not, you certainly tires me out, and I advise you that
>your speech is everything but impressive.
> And why are you so angry with here my friend Dog? Can't you see he is a
>good, not, an excelent person? If not, look at him fairly, telling which is
>right and which is not with unbreakable determination. Can't you recognise
>a leader on him?
> But in addition to this you must know, my dear friends, that there is a
>difference between a leader and a preacher, cause the former is raised by
>the community and the last one is just a product of an excessive self-
>esteem. So, what do you say about it, my loving Dog, are you 'proud' to be
>a christian? I know you are, pride is the stuff that idiots are made of.
> And in this sense, I must 'confess', my dear 'brothers', and with certain
>humor, that I recognise in old Dog not a leader but an unbeatable and
>metonymic paradigm of this chilling country called the USA. I mean, an
>enormous, clumsy, posh, conceited, christian, family yokel trying to
>patronize the whole world with the most hollow values. It is funny, isn't
>it? What do you say about it, Y-nuts? FUNFUNFUN?
>
>
> Undoubtly the worst thing about the 'boylover world' is trying to disguise
>pedophilia under a cloak of social aceptation, adorning then this condition
>with the most imminent 'human' values (commonly religious values like
>charity). Contrary to what a place like this might think, this conduct is
>absolutely pejorative toward people like us, cause talks about personal
>rejection. And these are wise words, which you'll miss here at Church.
>
> Love and hugs.
Hi Charlie Chuck.
What does religion have to do with anything? Aside from religion. You
ask if I'm proud to be a Christian. That's none of your business.
Notice how I do not ask you about yours. However, if you've ever paid
attention to anything I've written on the subject you already know
that I am more about belief than religion. Belief is personal,
religion is political and therefore poison in my opinion. I would much
rather be Christ-like than Christian and I try to be.
As for attempting to disguise pedophilia under a cloak of social
acceptance, that is an excellent point. What I do with boys when I am
in contact with them is build them up and give them a reason not to
hate people like us. What is it that you do with boys?
It's easy to sit back, poke fun, tear someone down and not express
your own views. But unless you take a stand for something, like I try
to do, what value is there in your complaining about those who try?
It's been awhile since I posted to MagOb asking the same questions,
and he is either ignoring me or has no answer. I expect I'll get the
same from you.
Doc
NP-f31
|
|