On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:43:42 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous
<nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote:
>Hairy Dude, this boy wrote to you in one of these forums, asking your
>help in participating more fully in what they had to offer. Two months
>later, my Hushmail Inbox is still empty of your reply.
>
>Now, you talk about taking care of vulnerable boys, but you don't make
>clear that your sympathy runs out when they get, oh, up to about 16. You
>wear your fort badge like King Billy his brass plaque, your big fat
>self-satisfaction at having got "inside" where all the goodies are (at
>least appear to be) is obscene to those kept out in the wasteland. Let
>me ask you, how vulnerable would you feel if the boot were on the other
>foot. And if you had asked that big-hearted old gramps Doc to open the
>door to a home just a chink, and you found you didn't qualify for his
>"caring", that you didn't appeal to the predator in him for the young
>soul, that you were decades too late for his "love". Too bad that more
>than an arm has been broken in those decades, and the breaking shows no
>sign of stopping.
>
>You occupy space in these forums and that space is no bigger than your
>own needs. You can see and hear all around the guys clamoring to share
>the space you occupy, but you shift not a quarter-inch. You don't
>recognise in these pathetic beggars the young souls that live in them.
>Time has blackened their boy beauty to your eyes. They don't feed your
>appetite.
>
>I have pointed out your contradiction to you before, that by making boys
>a class apart, by making caring and love dependent on age because a
>certain age is where your appetite lives, is in fact a real harm to the
>human beings that boys are and never cease to be no matter how long they
>live.
>
>There is nothing special about boys that is not special about us all. To
>hell with *your* "caring" and "love" for "boys".
>
>MagOb
Hmm ...
Now who on EARTH do you suppose this might be?
V
|
|