Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
> On 31 May 2006 20:07:49 -0700, "Strife767" <strife767@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
> >> On Mon, 29 May 2006 16:48:24 GMT, Katie Lynn <KLynnMD@StUltansHosp.ie>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Andrealphus wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In News 1148870053.914375.74850@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com,, bobandcarole
> >> >> at bobandcarole222@hotmail.com, typed this:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Want the truth faggot?
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> You're a lying sack of shit, and that picture doesn't prove a damned thing.
> >> >
> >> >It proves that the Christian Right can make scary propaganda.
> >>
> >>
> >> And your response (and that of the person you respond to) proves that
> >> homosexuals will Lie, Deny and do every thing possible to Suppress the
> >> Truth about homosexuality. Even when there is photographic evidence.
> >
> >Any NAMBLA dude could waltz around with his sign/banner "next to" any
> >group of people, and get his picture taken. Would that "photographic
> >evidence" be grounds for an automatic judgment that the people he was
> >standing next to at the time of the picture are people who are also
> >pedophiles?
>
>
> Catholic Priest
That's nice. Now do you actually have an answer, or are you too much of
a pussy to spew anything but more random nonsense?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 |
|