Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: James Riske <james_riske@nothingwillhappen_hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Anonymous pedophile faggot "Secret Squirrel" humiliates itself again
and again...
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:36:36 -0400
Organization: none
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <cj4vdo$1b2$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <4150dcdc$0$30122$45beb828@newscene.com> <Xns956BEBA9559A8NPf36@nowhere.com> <0001HW.BD766DE40013F39DF04375B0@news.easynews.com> <BLT22RDH38252.5803125@drg.poster> <cj0418$i0v$1@pita.alt.net> <Xns956E73E63942NPf36@nowhere.com> <30EV27NE38254.6003587963@drg.poster>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040809
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <30EV27NE38254.6003587963@drg.poster>
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:125
Secret Squirrel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
>
>
> What I want to know is how my observation of how Worky
> lied, and my classification of him as prankster troll, is
> somehow "lying".
>
> As for the rest of Riske's screed, it's merely a usenet
> form of penis envy. Good gawd, James knows that I'm smarter
> than he is, better-liked, and better-looking too. <grin>
> His tirade about me using anonymous remailers, for one
> example, is just sour grapes because he isn't smart enough
> to learn how to use them. It's already been established
> that "James Riske" is an anonymous pseudonym, but my
> pseudonym is just far more secure than his is.
>
> Secret Squirrel
>
This is yet another classic example of anonymous pedophile "Secret
Squirrel" pulling the old 'duck and run'.
Of course pedo "Secret" is not "better liked" since it is a pedophile,
most of the world despises pedophiles.
Of course what I post about "Secret" is not "penis envy" since I am able
to produce factual evidence to prove each and every claim I have ever
made against "Secret Squirrel".
Of course nobody has even came close to proving that the name I post
with is not my real name, not one shred of evidence has ever been posted
by anyone on usenet to support that idiotic theory.
I don't have any reason to use anonymous remailers, what I say and do on
usenet is completely acceptable, unlike pedophiles I don't break the law
and neither do I talk about wanting to break the law.
Pedophiles are pissed because I have the courage to come here and
denounce them for their poor choices in life that bring about harm to
little children.
I have challenged anonymous pedophile "Secret" to a debate about
pedophilia on many occasions and guess what, the pedophile has ran from
every challenge because it knows it *must* lie in order to give the
illusion that it can support its claims about pedophilia and it knows I
will expose its lies right here on usenet.
Anonymous pedophile "Secret Squirrel" is perhaps the most cowardly
pedophile to ever post to usenet as well as the most depraved, it knows
that in a straight-up debate against me it will lose, and it will lose
badly.
It's always fun watching these demented pedophile faggots pretend to
have any shred of credibility or merit even though it is so easy to
prove that they don't have either.
So noted.
--
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do
nothing."--Edmund Burke
|
|