On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:34:39 -0600, HMS Victor Victorian
<victorvictorian@hushunomail.com> wrote:
>Yes. If you review certain images from the most recent sets closely,
>you will see a discreet hirsute sprouting 'neath the arms. I would
>guess his age to be 13 or 14 years old.
>
>A bit old for me, although he is still very attractive, and now the
>photographer will no longer compel dear Jimmy to put a sock in it, as
>it were.
>
>V
>God Save the Queen.
>God Bless the Prince of Wales.
>God Preserve the Windsors.
>Rule Britannia!
Indeed, I have noticed the increased dusting of hair on the forearms
as well.
I would tend to dispute the estimate of 13 or certainly 14, based on
Jimmy's overall size, but then one can rarely tell the age of a boy by
his relative development. Indeed, over the years I have personally
seen boys that had faint strips or small patches of underarm hair well
before their 12th birthday, and other boys that had not even a few
wispies "down there" well into their 13th year.
The other question is how old he is now versus how old he was when the
pictures were actually taken. While the website's update was just
today, I would wonder how long ago the pictures posted today were
taken. Days? Weeks? Months? Who knows.
Certainly would be interesting to find out for sure, but I suspect
he'll be a looker for some time to come. I will keep looking for as
long as he graces us with his beauty.
I'll take this opportunity to send a shout out to Doc. Hi Doc!
And oh yeah, hi KH, wherever you are! And a nudge to Tommy, just
because.
Chad (NP-b24)
"Well, can't he just beam up?"
"This is *reality* Greg."
|
|