Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "bobandcarole" <bobandcarole111@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: Catch them before they strike..John Walsh busts pedophile ass Saturday
Followup-To: alt.support.girl-lovers,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.oyp.norp,alt.disgusting.stories.my-imagination
Date: 29 Apr 2006 02:06:23 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <1146301583.009535.7570@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
References: <1146165826.209066.155700@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<PJT9WDOH38836.1417476852@twistycreek.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.203.173.34
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1146301588 9565 127.0.0.1 (29 Apr 2006 09:06:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:06:28 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <PJT9WDOH38836.1417476852@twistycreek.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.203.173.34;
posting-account=Rvwpbg0AAADSSWt3Ir3dJXyZyhGk6E2p
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:1012
GnuGuy wrote:
> Groups trimmed. groups added
>
> "bobandcarole" <bobandcarole812@webtv.net> wrote in
> news:1146165826.209066.155700@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
>
> >
> >
> > Predators Lurking Online -- Catching Them Before They Strike
> > 4/25/2006
> >
> > The danger on the internet is real for a generation of children whose
> > social lives can be just as active online as off. The National Center
> > for Missing and Exploited Children estimates that in 2005 one out of
> > five children was solicited online by an adult.
> >
> > The war against online predators has begun in many law enforcement
> > agencies around the country. Cops have set up stings to arrest
> > suspects trying to meet underage kids for sexual encounters. All
> > suspects will have their day in court -- and if convicted, become
> > registered sex offenders.
> >
> >
> It is quite peculiar that these men have been arrested for
> committing no crime.
>
> Did they solicit sex from a minor?
> Did they have sex with a minor?
> Did they engage in improper language or touching with
> a minor?
>
> No, it was an adult police officer pretending to be a minor.
That's right...surprise surprise LOL
>
> They may have *thought* that's what they were doing, but
> thought is not a crime. Is it?
Attempting to seduce a child via the internet is a Felony...
They play, they PAY....
>
> Of course I understand that the people involved in executing these
> stings would like to believe that the people involved *would
> have* committed a crime had the person on the other end actually
> been a minor, but since they didn't, they - didn't.
They admit that they were there for sex, idiot
>
> I believe that a careful analysis of the actual sting dialogues
> would reveal differences between what a minor would have
> said and done versus a police officer. For example, a child
> would not offer enticing and suggestive language, and then
> agree to meet with the person on the other end. It's all
> fantasy, from beginning to end.
Try watching the shows before you fart again.....
>
> GnuGuy
|
|