"rant" <rent-a-rant@soapbox.com> wrote in
news:EG1vf.127895$z82.255@fe12.news.easynews.com:
> I think this is group might be better for you. It hasn't been used for
> 6 months.
>
> I am glad you you decided to find another place for some of the more
> controversial vids you have. Even though we all may be called boy
> lovers, for some seeing an adult having his sexual way with a 6ish yo
> tyke is more than they can stomach.
>
> While I am sure you understand the situation, I still feel compelled
> to say to you that not only are some boy lovers deeply offended by
> very young children being violated by much older adults, so too is
> everyone else. I doubt anything galvanizes the internet child
> protection community to action faster than those who possess,
> manufacture, or distribute images depicting such behavior. If you are
> confident that you are safe, then this group may be the best place for
> you and others who have similar tastes.
>
> This opinion of mine is offered not as a bashing, but more like a
> splash of cold water. I would rather make sure you understand these
> realities as I see them, than take a chance that you do not. Please,
> be safe and be sure.
>
I agree...perhaps if he kept the kids in the pics or vids at least in the
puberty stage (even early puberty)...there would be less controversy.
Nik
|
|