Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Other" <gonzo106@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pern
Subject: Re: Movie and Game
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 03:42:14 -0500
Organization: Not the Illunimati
Message-ID: <12n8dqni9cprbcb@corp.supernews.com>
References: <jVFbh.55038$39.16701@southeast.rr.com> <1164919929.135299.323380@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <eko3ir$nhh$1@iruka.swcp.com> <1165006113.849632.171980@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <ekqq8j$evq$1@iruka.swcp.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 25
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.pern:577
> A photorealistic CGI dragon won't be worth the electrons expended to
> render it if the story gets butchered. Heck, I'd be quite happy with
> an animated Pern of Rankin-Bass quality *iff*[1] the story adaptation
> is done *right*.
>
> [1] That's a mathematical "iff": "if, and only if"
>
>
got to agree with you on this one. As an example, The Star Trek
Animated series was recently released on DVD and I'm thinking about
getting it. Why?
Because some of the stories were great, despite the awful animation.
I'd rather have a good story with bad effects than the other way around.
--
Other
Not a member of the Illuminati
|
|