| Re: PING===> Michael aka Cheat, Fraud, Plagiarist. |
alphabets'R'us |
| abc (abc@wxyz.org) |
2005/12/06 09:46 |
On 6-Dec-2005, MichaellikeGod@heaven wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:47:21 GMT, "abc" <abc@wxyz.org> wrote:
>
> >"Anything that does not strengthen me morally
> >is the enemy of virtue within me. Whether I overcome, thereby
> >producing virtue, depends on the level of moral excellence in my life.
> >But we must fight to be moral. Morality does not happen by accident;
> >moral virtue is acquired." - Oswald Chambers (1874-1917)
> >
> >Michael, would it be so difficult to add a man's name as an attribution
> >to
> >his words which you have stolen, instead of appearing to claim them as
> >your
> >own "original" thinking?
> >
> >I doubt you have ever had a truly original thought of your own. You join
> >the
> >ranks of the other liars and charlatans who post without shame from
> >behind
> >Y-Not's cloak.
> >
> >Or, as Queen would have said:
> >
> >"Dum, dum, dum! Another one bites the dust!"
> If I am abusing or infringing on the copyright piece then turn me in
> as you wish. I am approved to use such material as I wish without any
> repercussions in abuse, fraud, or otherwise infringing on the
> copyright of person's because I have their blessings and approval. The
> material I presented did not say that it came from Oswald Chambers or
> anybody else, therefore I contest the fact I do not have to use the
> name. I have thousands of pieces of an abridged works at my disposal
> to use for any particular post I may choose. It is from a software
> package of which many abridged works are classified and ordered by
> content or topic and some ordered by books. If the authorship is
> known, I post the credit, if it is not known and I do not contest that
> it is even my piece, then leave the credit whereas.
>
> Just like the Bible came from a publisher, authors, writers, and such.
> But when quoted, do I give credit to those publishers, authors,
> writers, etc.? No, we imply that the credit is due God because it is
> God's glory at work in a Word that was quoted by the Holy Spirit and
> reproduced by those publishers, authors, writers, etc.
>
> I am a Christian that does no writing for a living of the fact. Of the
> few pieces I have written, there has been much struggle in the writing
> and much thought put in for content. I am not articulate in writing my
> thoughts like Y-Not. Leave Y-Not out of any issues that anybody has
> with me because Y-Not is not the perpetrator of the incident and no I
> do not have to hide behind Y-Not's cloak to hide anything of which I
> cannot stand on my own two feet to defend.
>
> I actually looked up the works of Oswald Chambers and found it was an
> abridged work, therefore, yes, I am wrong and yes I should give him
> the credit, but no, not to discredit him for an abridged version of
> the topic. I never used an exact quotation from his work, therefore it
> does no worth to credit him for an abridged version of a topic that
> may or may not be his.
>
> I have never claimed any of the material I post has come from me but
> only a few pieces have of which I still do not take the credit for
> writing. If a name is submitted along with the piece, of which I have
> posted in my pieces, then I would post and give the author its due
> credit.
>
> t Michael t
Thank you for your answer, which is so full of doublespeak, and of such
length, as to be worthy of the convoluted mind and the arthritic fingers of
the panjandrum himself.
A question begets an answer which doubles back on itself, makes phony
allegations, goes on and on to interminable lengths, and has absolutely no
bearing on the simple question asked.
You blew it, TMikeyT, just like all of the other fakers before you.
NEXT!
--
abc
|
|
|