On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:20:23 -0500, "::Y-Not::" <+10$-Y-Not@here.com>
wrote:
>> (Revelation 22:13). Thus they control all history and all humans of
>> all generations.
>>
>> which Ezra and Nehemiah apply to persons of foreign extraction who
>> performed menial tasks in the Temple. Moses assigned Midianite
>> prisoners of war to the priests (32 servants; Numbers 31:28, 40) and
>> the Levites (320 servants; Numbers. 31:30, 47). Joshua forced the
>> Gibeonites to serve as woodcutters and water bearers for the sanctuary
>> (Joshua 9:27). The servants which David gave to the Levites were also
>> likely war prisoners (Ezra 8:20).
>>
>> Representatives of the Nethinim returned from Exile with Zerubbabel in
>> 538 B.C. (Ezra 2:43-54; Nehemiah 7:46-56). The lists of returnees
>> contain many foreign names suggesting their origin as prisoners of
>> war. Despite their foreign origin, the Nethinim appear to be accepted
>> as part of the people of Israel. They were prohibited from mixed
>> marriages with the people of the land (Nehemiah 10:28-30) and shared
>> in the responsibility for repair of the Jerusalem city walls (Nehemiah
>> 3:26; contrast Ezra 4:1-3). The Nethinim resided in the Ophel district
>> of Jerusalem, likely near the water gate (Nehemiah 3:26), a site
>> conducive with their task as water bearers.
>>
>> Christ, Christology "Christ" is the English rendering of the Greek
>> Christos, meaning "anointed." Messiah also translates the
>> corresponding Hebrew term mashiach, the anointed one.
>>
>> response was guarded: not denying it, but distancing Himself from the
>> political and social connotations which a nationalist Judaism had
>> accepted as commonplace in the expected Deliverer. (See Mark 10:35-45;
>> Luke 24:19-21; Acts 1:6 for the evidence that even the disciples
>> entertained such a hope.) At the trial Jesus was interrogated on this
>> point. The balance of the evidence points in the direction that He
>> still maintained a reserve (Matthew 26:63, 64; Luke 22:67, 68), with
>> the same reluctance to be identified with a worldly messiah-king
>> charge of being a messianic claimant and a rival to the emperor in
>> Rome (Mark 15:26, 32). The Gospels make it clear that there was no
>> direct and supportable evidence that Jesus so claimed to be such a
>> figure. Instead, He consistently viewed His life and mission as
>> out of loyalty to the truth and is at length rewarded by being
>> songs (Isaiah 42:1-4; 49:5-7; 52:13-53:12). If this is the correct
>> and to His mission, it helps to explain how He looked confidently
>> beyond defeat and death to His vindication by God in the resurrection.
>> Whatever destiny of suffering and rejection by His people awaited Him,
>> to newness of life.
>>
>> This is the literal sense of which can be applied to spiritual sense
>> of our soul or spirit today (newness of life).
>>
>> the Roman political powers stood in direct and obvious contradiction
>> Deliverer of His people and a glorious Figure. The crux is seen in
>> Deuteronomy 21:23 which prescribed that anyone hanging on a tree died
>>
>
>Why was the Greek alphabet used in the illustration of the beginning
>and the end? Why was the Greek word Christos used, instead of a word of
>any other language? Latin was the predominant language of the time, yet
>it wasn't used in the Bible then. Why?
>
>You didn't answer the question about the true name of Jesus. "Christ"
>isn't part of his name, but a title.
>"Anointed one" means recognized leader, such as a king or Prophet. It
>comes from the ceremony of "anointing", which is pouring holy (blessed)
>olive oil on top of the head of the person to be honored. It happened
>to a little shepherd boy, who later knocked off a giant. Ah, David.
>:-)
>
>"Jesus" is a Romanized version of of the Greek "Jesu", which is
>pronounced, in phonetic English. "Yeasoo", from the Hebrew, in phonetic
>English, Yeashua, which, when converted directly into modern English,
>is Joshua. His father was Yoseph. So his real name is "Yeashua ben
>Yoseph", or in English, "Joshua, son of Joseph".
>
>Israel and Juda were being severely oppressed by the Roman occupation,
>and their temples were being defiled. They were looking for someone to
>"deliver" them from the oppression. This is what Messiah means. In
>effect, they wanted a great general to fight off the Romans. The first
>general of the Hebrews, was Joshua, who conquered Canaan. Then a new
>Teacher (Rabbi) arose, who performed miracles, and was followed as a
>Prophet, and he had the same name as the famous first general! They
>were going to be saved! The asked for Messiah had come to vanquish the
>Romans, with the might of God's wrathful armor. A new Joshua had come
>to save them. And then they saw what they got instead. They wanted a
>great general, and all they got was a pansy impractical "love thy
>neighbor" preacher, who wouldn't hurt a fly. He said you should suffer
>now, and have a nice time after you died. This was VERY unpopular with
>the masses, after their massive disappointment at finding out that he
>wasn't going to fight, even to save himself. His great message wasn't
>appreciated by his own people, hardly at all, during his lifetime, and
>for quite a time after his death, just because he was named Joshua, but
>wasn't the Joshua they wanted at the time. Talk about RESENTMENT!
>
>You got "Nephalim" wrong. The (Hebrew) word is only used once, in
>Genesis, and nowhere else. The "im" ending, indicates that it is
>plural. It is sometimes translated as "Giants", but no one, in over
>1800 years, really knows what that word actually means. Some scholars
>think it may mean a kind of people who were the crossbreed offspring of
>angels and humans. Some odd people think they were space aliens. But in
>reality, no one knows.
>
>The First Ecumenical Council, at which the Bible was created, was ROMAN
>Catholic. They made the Catholic Bible. YOUR Bible. So you don't like
>Catholics, but you're stuck with their Bible. Well, too bad. :-)
>
>So, now here is the big question:
>In what language was the Bible originally written, and why is that
>critically important in the study of it?
>
>
>Y Not
>
>
>PS.
>Come on, be honest. You didn't know what those Greek words meant, when
>I challenged you, so you looked it up. Well?
>It looks to me that most of your post is direct copy/paste, and not
>your own words. How much of it do you really understand? If I were to
>grade your "paper" for this assignment, you would get a D-. And yes, I
>have been in a position to do that. :-)
>Please do better next time.
I don't profess to know everything about the Bible. You are not
backing up your puffed-up knowledge with scripture.
1 Corinthians 8:1
Now about food sacrificed to idols: We know that we all possess
knowledge. Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up.
Where in Genesis is the word Nephalim used in context? I have arrayed
scripture to where you find Nethinim applied indirectly or directly.
You had suggested in your questioning about the spelling, so I used
Nethinim as opposed to Nephalim.
The New Testament was written in Greek. The Old Testament was written
in Hebrew with a sprinkling of Aramaic.
The Bible had its origin from the scrolls (Dead Sea Scrolls) of
ancient times. Moses wrote Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers,
Deuteronomy. The Apostle John wrote the book of Revelation with
approximately 64 authors in between.
I do not need to know why Latin was not used in the writing of the New
Testament. It's irrelavent. My intent in this newsgroup is to spread
the Word of God, hopefully win dead souls to Christ, steer professing
weak Christians away from such filth in this newsgroup, denouncing
sin, spread knowledge of God's Word as is relavent to His Holiness,
spread love and compassion for one another as I have experienced
Christ bestowing love and compassion on me.
Your intent is to flame, denounce, ridicule, and bring about scoffing
of a professing person who does not care to engage in such
conversation.
2 Peter 3:3-4
First of all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will
come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. They will say,
"Where is this 'coming' he promised? Ever since our fathers died,
everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation.
While your knowledge could be put to good use, I find it intriguing
and have learned some things from you. While your intent is to
discreit me, why not consider posting your knowledge in a positive way
as opposed to negative intent.
What is your motive or intent in being in this newsgroup anyway? You
seem to possess great knowledge of which I could appreciate. But to
denounce my authority by which God has given me the motivation and
desire of such intent for being in this newsgroup, does not harm me or
cause me to shy away from such flaming.
I little of my history as Michael. I prayed to God at the age of 7
that I wanted to be the Michael of Revelation 12:7. I had just
received my first Bible at that age and turned to the back and found
the name there. Well, the prayer perculated in the hands of God for 33
years. On September 21, 2004, at the age of 40, I heard a voice
resonate from my body that called my name, "Michael." I asked the
voice, "Are you God?" I contemplated for three days on the voice. It
was not a voice that was perceived through the ears like we literally
hear of our senses. It was a vibration of the body cells calling out
the name. Well, while contemplating about the voice I experienced, I
remembered my prayer at the age of 7. With all due respect for that
experience, I have had similar experiences since. Such words as Bye,
Identify, Tell, West have resonated with similar experiences as when
the calling of Michael was experienced.
What I have experienced in the single voice vibrating through my body
does not explicitely declare that God is talking to me. It could be an
angel that is causing me to experience the vibrations. Or the Holy
Spirit could be talking in such a manner. It could also be my spirit
or soul crying out to God.
I have prayed many times about being Michael of Revelation 12:7. All
the prayers have been answered with a resounding, "Yes." Such prayers
included sending rain at specific times, causing events to occur,
experiencing situations in my life.
You may discredit me by saying I am paranoid schizophrenic. I
understand paranoid schizophrenic because I had the mental illness in
my mid years. I have experienced the demonic voices that cause
destruction and mental instability in a person that is diagnosed with
such an illness. Why the paranoid schizophrenia? Well, I ran away from
some horrific sins thinking I could escape from the guilt I was
expereincing. But God's wrath was upon me and caused the mental
instability or experience of paranoid schizophrenia.
But I can humbly thank God this day for prayers answered in the
healing from paranoid schizophrenia. I do not take any psychotrophic
medication this day. I do not hear voices that are illuminated through
the ears such as a paranoid schizophrenic would perceive. I do not
hallucinate, I do not have dillusional thinking, I am a stable, well
adjusted, functioning citizen of society today.
I have no fear of you or anyone in this newsgroup. If anyone's attempt
to flame or discredit me is their intent, I will not shy away but
boldly go about my work with good and pure intentions and motivation.
I am a happy, content, loving person that distributes love, grace, and
mercy to those that I contend with.What God distributes to me in love,
grace, and mercy, I absorb what I need and any excessive attribute is
distributed at will to those I am exposed to or made for contact with
as God directs others to me. Yes, you are forgiven for trying to
discredit me and flame me. Try to be positive rather than so negative.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|