Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pegas
Subject: Re: Repost "Adrian_(Recompiled-By-sb).avi.000" yEnc [001of563] (0/1)
From: "Sebastian NP-g06" <!@mail.com>
References: <43656f6c$0$18631$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <yTu9f.139815$aX.139282@fe09.news.easynews.com> <436684f2$0$18638$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <YFNT1UAS38657.9220486111@reece.net.au>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 01 Nov 2005 19:55:22 GMT
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <4367c82a$0$18632$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4841498b.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=XAZZM4Lgi\TJ[9olalG_WRL?0kYOcDh@Z_FAFF\Vf;UYFQBGMo><D@_DAgjH4bP]nZAKA_QWXHZWZi]381dJVKo^
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.pegas:3233
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On 31 Oct 2005 20:56:18 GMT, "Sebastian NP-g06" <!@mail.com> wrote:
>
>>1) Sorry if am wrong about original poster.
>> I dont remember who post that vid. Is that you?
>> If yes, am sorry about that, hehehe. :-X
>
> Boy, usenet memory is definitely getting shorter... Qwerk only
> finished posting the original Adrian vid here two days ago, after
> spending about a fortnight on it. I guess that you must have been too
> excited about seeing the vid? ;-)
>
>>2) AVI is better than MPEG or MPG format.
>> Why? Because now in new AVI drivers like Xvid,
>> you can encoding a AVI movie with the MPEG-4
>> algorythms, and with deblocking Vertical & Horizontal
>> option.(remove visual block compression) In 1 pass
>> (encoding) this is nice. In 2 pass this is perfect,
>> (encoding slow), but the result is realy great and
>> close to original video source (like DVD, or VHS).
>> The prob with MPEG or MPG format is the blocking
>> compression. With mpeg, you can encoding really
>> fast, but this is crap. Too many blocks appear on video.
>> Many good MPEG prog. exist like 'FlashMPEG' or 'MainConcept MPEG'
>> But the best encoding is AVI for me.
>
> That's nice, but I think you'll find that the original vid was posted
> using an AVI container format with the video encoded using DivX,
> albeit with a higher video bitrate. Just in case you weren't aware,
> Qwerk did mention in a previous thread (Re: Question about recent AVI
> postings, 21 Oct 2005) that he didn't re-encode the vid using MPEG
> because of the loss of quality in the output.
>
> I'm sure there are many here who will appreciate the chance at
> downloading your more compressed version of Adrian, and I guess that
> Qwerk may appreciate the time you've saved him in reposting a smaller
> version. By the way, did you see his offer to create and post a
> smaller version of Adrian for dialup users (Ping ----->
> Dial-up-Users)? He posted the offer about 6 hours before you began to
> post Adrian_(Recompiled-By-sb).avi. This isn't really my business to
> say, but it might have been a little more courteous to let him know
> your plans in advance, at least I would have appreciated that if it
> were me.
>
> Kind regards,
> uw
Hi uw
Yeah that's right... But am so sorry, i never seen hes tread
about a 'smaller version' on my newsreader. So, am very
sorry about that.
Qwerk, if you read me, am sorry my friend! :-(
And thank you for your message uw
Sebastian NP-g06
|
|