On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:41:15 GMT, "Qwerk NP-g10" <qwerk@no.mail>
wrote:
>silent_one <no@no.no> wrote in
>news:v7rhl1h4851dg7t8ifjqqdb2qahgsu30jl@4ax.com:
>
>> i was wondering why so many new vids are
>> posted in avi format which needs codecs to play instead of
>> the good old mpg format that works everywhere!
>> Besides that, those files are really huge and take forever
>> to download using a dialup connection. Avi files used to be
>> small because of compression but recently you need to
>> download 500mb to watch just 15-20 minutes of vid
>> I don't mean that to be a complaint, just a question
>
>Hello, let me explain. My Adrian version is on a DVD as .vob-
>file. I've converted it to a .avi-file because the quality is
>better than converted to an .mpg-file. I would avoid a big
>loss of quality.
>
>If I would have a program to split .vob-files I would have
>done it, but I never have found a such programm as freeware.
>
>Qwerk NP-g10
Actually i haven't seen Adrian (too big for me to download) so i don't
know about its quality. For the 500mb example i mentioned before i had
in mind the Frankie vids posted here before. Most of those vids were
filmed in VHS or 8MM so even if they were transferred to DVD first and
then to AVI to be posted here, the quality will be, at best, equal to
VHS. Besides that, the sound in the original film is usually mono. Why
should it be transformed to DVD quality sound? Picture or sound
quality can't possibly get better than the ones in the original
recording!
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
|