Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.fan.oldfart
Subject: Re: Hey! You Know Who.
Date: 16 May 2004 11:25:20 -0500
Organization: Ignorance Unlimited, Ltd.
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <hi4fa0lklk6sgi4p2cn4578a6ttr1rh110@4ax.com>
References: <e5jda091ep01862hkh2cen1to68k6e0scq@4ax.com> <0inda018s0ar3bp3eqt3he7jc69ql63jm5@4ax.com>
Reply-To: Why Bother?
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.oldfart:315
<Tattooed@mailmasher.com> wrote:
and just had to say the following...
>his/her/its keyboard, and the results are as follows:
>$Just WTF is that Amadeus fellow on about in hussy.
>$Eh?
>$TIA
>$
>>He is just trying to divert attention away from Grainfarmer/Woodstock.
>>He just trying to dredge up ancient history on me to achieve this. It is
>>my opinion that this Amadeus is really Kinda Dumb who always sucked
>>Woodstock's ass. Do you remember Kinda Dumb? I could be wrong, but,
>>I don't know who else it could be.
I see. But why does he want to divert attention away from that
person?
It didn't take much thought to reach the conclusion that WS is GF, but
so what?
I just don't get it.
Yeah, I remember the nic, Kinda Dumb, but can't remember much else
about him.
That usually means that I didn't have any run ins, good or bad, with
the nic.
You suggest that I simply ignore him, so, unless he keeps yammering, I
will do so.
That's not my style, in instances like this, where someone is shooting
off their yap, claiming to know stuff.
They actually know something, I want to know what it is, and w/o a
bunch of cryptic nonsense involved.
But, it's no skin off of my nose, bro, either way.
--
A dunce for all seasons.
Founder & President, *Dunce of the Month Club*
Coordinator, *Yaks for the Yakless, International*
Voted *Usenets Most Trusted Person In History*, 1956 - 2005.
Declared *The Hardest Working Dunce In All Of Usenet*, 1963 - 2005.
Quote: "I have never met a dunce I've liked!"
---------
The preceding post was scanned for signs of
FAILED
-----------------
broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|