| Pong: Wildman. |
Ignorance Unlimited, Ltd .. |
| FastmanŽ (NoW@ayJose.com) |
2004/02/16 08:45 |
Then again, maybe not.<s>
--=FM=--
Path:
newscene.com!newscene!newscene!novia!novia!snoopy.risq.qc.ca!cyclone.bc.net!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news
Date: 16 Feb 2004 06:47:34 -0000
Message-ID: <20040216064734.23095.qmail@gacracker.org>
From: Beelzebub <Beelzebub@redneck.gacracker.org>
Subject: Re: Dr. Who Security Faq. Revision 17.6
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.ll-series
References: <Xns948F5F5862ACAnonymous@63.218.45.20>
<hess20pg5atp5hkuciithsqfl6n78012qa@4ax.com>
<20040216050345.20925.qmail@gacracker.org>
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Administrative-Comment: Send comments to <admin@redneck.gacracker.org>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 50
Xref: newscene.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.ll-series:275418
On 16 Feb 2004, Beelzebub <Beelzebub@redneck.gacracker.org> wrote:
>>On 14 Feb 2004 06:32:02 GMT, Eggplant <vegetables@theguarden.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>May I? Thank you.
>>This "revision" has always been suspect.
>>When it first appeared in abpep-t, we attempted to contact the good
>>doctor, to verify it's authenticity, but strangely, were unable to do
>>so.
>>That inability to contact him was very unusual, and to this very date,
>>we have never been able to contact him, as we had done so often, in
>>the past.
>>So, I wouldn't trust version 17.6, as having been authored by Dr. Who.
>>That is not to say that it wasn't, just that it cannot be verified, as
>>having come from him.
>>I'll stick with the previous versions, as I know for a fact, that he
>>wrote them.
>>HTH
>
>Dr.Who has recently posted in alt.security.scramdisk, discussing DCPP. His
>post's were signed and the sig is valid, so I think it is verifiable that
>v17.6 is authored by Dr. Who. The FAQ itself is signed and verifiable, so
>what's not to trust?
Please ignore this post, as the sig is NOT valid. At least not with a
trusted key from Dr. Who. I seem to have gone off half-cocked and had
an incorrect key. I've searched for Dr. Who's key and I'm having
trouble finding one that *is* valid. The closest I have come is the
one from the FAQ at http://welcome.to/abpept and this key is not
verifiable either. It comes from a source that I have *some* trust in,
so I'm sticking with it until a better alternative shows up.
Anyone know of a way to verify any of the faq's? Has anyone got a Dr.
Who key that can be verified? Preferably signed by some other trusted
person?
_
Beelzebub
|
|
|