Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 13:15:26 -0600
From: Curly Bill <CurlyBill@Tombstone.town>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.oldfart
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 13:15:44 -0600
Organization: The Cowboys
Reply-To: CurlyBill@Tombstone.town
Message-ID: <quarvvs34vnnliradncdedrte95j0c1g86@4ax.com>
References: <fv8fvvcs6k92blhfruac7puda2kt0c1nm2@4ax.com> <bt92fn$ig8$0@pita.alt.net> <nfdgvvggva4af9jg349jl74tmps37o0qq0@4ax.com> <btcppj$um5$1@pita.alt.net> <24klvvgses4nr51qhd7786jhmg9q0197b0@4ax.com> <rkcnvvospgls5sjsb6ds0g8vjrsi239r4g@4ax.com> <v7dnvvs5t0vfaa5bq4dsp7njdf13dotvpg@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 93
X-Trace: sv3-V7qGuUdt/CwN+o2t6KjqfQ53Oq7jLhdbTg+Vm2jmAWMKPMRaf1oAn8vvE5cHQDrUiTddFop5VRAGfJC!eVaLWfl1hIAkRlbJtamSKsdaO1j78KurhVevzo2LwkFs/gDMXkx2O0vsnU5ZcXPjDYAnoA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.oldfart:178
>On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 01:18:34 -0600, Curly Bill
><CurlyBill@Tombstone.town> wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>>>NoW@ayJose.com tossed this thought out into the electronic ether for all of us
>>>>here to read, and said.......
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>NoW@ayJose.com tossed this thought out into the electronic ether for all of
>>>>us
>>>>>>here to read, and said.......
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I think that even with a crappy "paste" job on my part, you can get
>>>>>>>the gist of my concerns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I was acquitted from a WACO related busting in 1999, been using usenet
>>>>>>>since 1995. How about you? <------Who can this be? LDU?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Could be, especially with the Luis part, but the me@me tag reminds me of
>>>>>>someone and I do not think it was he. Then I am not able to tell you now all
>>>>>>the people I heard of who were busted during this era, so it would be both
>>>>bad
>>>>>>memory on my part, and a lack of interest!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, I sort of agree about "a lack of interest..." except that the guy
>>>>>is advising newbies to use P2P to DL kp, claiming that it is far safer
>>>>>than Usenet.
>>>>>But, I do grow weary of trying to protect newbies, and especially as
>>>>>my viewing interests have shifted to the opposite end of the spectrum
>>>>>these past few years.
>>>>>Perhaps it's just time for me to let it be.
>>>>
>>>>Newbies will always be jail-fodder for LEA no matter how much one tries to
>>>>educate them. As they look at the images in Usenet, their brain becomes overly
>>>>saturated to the point where it slowly slips lower in the cranium, filtering
>>>>down the spine and eventually resting solidly in their anus, allowing logic
>>>>and mental process to pass quickly to the crotch where it becomes incredibly
>>>>preoccupied with non-life-surviving skills. The result is a vast hole in the
>>>>security typically present in sane thought, and in the end (pardon the pun),
>>>>an intimate relationship with someone named Bubba within excessively close
>>>>quarters and adding new meaning to the term "asshole".
>>>>In summary, there is absolutely no safe way to either download or, and
>>>>especially, upload child porn safely. Whenever a better mouse is bred, LEA
>>>>creates an even better mousetrap. And when the encoding is superior, as in the
>>>>case of RSA PGP, they will attempt to destroy and/or dilute it completely so
>>>>it cannot be effective at all.
>>>>And make no mistake, the efforts of LEA are an on-going cat and mouse game.
>>>>But the longer you play the game, the more risk there is that you will make a
>>>>mistake and be a loser. LEA can lose hundreds of times in a row, but a newbie
>>>>cannot afford to lose even once!!!
>>>
>>>I totally agree with you.
>>>The LEA's technical advancements, in tracing posters, plus the
>>>international cooperation between such agencies, has certainly changed
>>>since the old days.
>>>
>>>While the newbies can be expected to act foolish, what amazes me are
>>>the antics of some of the older regs.
>>>I've seen regs use anonymous servers, chained together, and accessed
>>>via a series of proxies, to post binaries, and then exchange e-mail
>>>with each other!
>>>Not all of them, but several do engage in such silliness.
>>>It's as though having reached a certain level of security, they feel
>>>invincible.
>>>Incredible!
>>>
>>>Back when a couple of the new PGP groups were starting, I was invited
>>>to join in, but I declined.
>>>I don't have anything to contribute, have probable seen 99% of
>>>whatever they have, and cannot allow my security to be a part of a
>>>group thing, where the chain is only as strong as it's weakest link.
>>>
>>>Besides, at my age, young girls are between 30 and 45 years old!
>>>
>>Shit, at your age, young girls are betwen 40 and 55.
>
>Uh, how far between?
>I mean heck, just because I don't have any tattoos, should I have to
>wait so long?
>
You should get some tattoos. The female really goes for them. They
think it's some sort of permanent makeup and they like the colors. You
should see my eyeliner. <BFG>
|
|