Renli wrote:
> On Nov 30, 12:58 pm, Mac <mrnap...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>>Renli wrote:
>>
>>>On Nov 30, 11:37 am, Shava_X <voodopeo...@rocketNOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:03:06 -0800, Renli wrote:
>>
>>>>>http://www.nationalterroralert.com/updates/2007/11/10/chinese-sub-pop...
>>
>>>>>-
>>
>>>>It is almost certain that this was because one or more people screwed up,
>>>>not because of some magical technological advance by the Chinese. One or
>>>>more people are soon to loose their careers over this, and the U.S. Navy
>>>>will re-emphasise the basics of anti-submarine warfare. That will put an
>>>>end to surprise visits.
>>
>>>"The sub was apparently able to slip past at least a dozen U.S.
>>>warships, two U.S. submarines and a vast array of advanced technology,
>>>which failed to detect it."
>>
>>no failure
>>military's way of asking for more money, nothing more..
>>
>>
>>>However, it is not projected to - snicker - "put an end to suprise
>>>visits" for at least 4 to 6 years. By which time China will have a
>>>floating Aircraft Carrier.
>>
>>>-
>>
>>do u, actually believe that stuff u write?
>>
>>M.
>
>
> Yes.
then u, Truly are the idiot that people here, say you are!
>
> What does M. stand for?
>
> -
|
|