X-Received: by 10.50.126.69 with SMTP id mw5mr1423723igb.7.1382103152958;
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 06:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:32:32 -0500
From: "Oglethorpe" <antikerry@go.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.frank.mccoy
References: <524c388a$0$30596$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com> <K86dnSNJiKF7ncnPnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@mchsi.com> <52549766$0$13195$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com> <ohfc599bfdaveg8nc81m53f6tlumchivea@4ax.com> <52569a15$0$19968$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com> <bsed5994qcjh7m36pb0nejem9b31icl81s@4ax.com> <525fce2f$0$31873$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com> <8vr169l2htib09ibjlbbvetojr3bm0mhij@4ax.com> <52611c08$0$32308$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com>
Subject: Re: Gone Or Still Packing?
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:32:14 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Message-ID: <i62dndHjQLftpfzPnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@mchsi.com>
Lines: 37
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 50.80.153.116
X-Trace: sv3-5Z6z/0bG80kMY5ssU4Urur5Jo6ksQr87B8eNcPOP9klG60tB3ncUIs7f3eGB4dO8bTaKr1qbmYASGtp!tugtF27RQzsPCmqfO9HEnwJ8M2/puRn+N5aPYtcM4VOtclcjqSn8pVn1RkPki6Jcflfc/6Ft4pBK!KPur7cU=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2676
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2960821075
X-Received-Bytes: 3209
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.frank.mccoy:1540
"F. Brown" <fredbrown@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:52611c08$0$32308$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com...
>
> "Frank McCoy" <mccoyf@millcomm.com> wrote in message
> news:8vr169l2htib09ibjlbbvetojr3bm0mhij@4ax.com...
>> "F. Brown" <fredbrown@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Personally I don't think the judge should have
>>>taken so long to render his decision. SCOTUS hears much more elaborate
>>>and difficult cases and renders decisions within a couple of months. Why
>>>should your decision take years? Anyway, glad to see you back.
>>
>>
>> Appeals courts often take years; and the SCOTUS in some cases DOES
>> take years. It's only in "national emergencies" (as defined more by
>> politics than any real disaster) that they speed things up.
>>
>> But, I do tend to agree: Six years for a judge to rule on a case, even
>> one as complicated as mine, DOES seem a bit excessive. Especially so,
>> in light of what his final ruling was.
>>
>
> The judge probably made his decision two minutes after your lawyer began
> your defense.
>
Same decision as Pontius Pilot made. The judge washed his hads of the
matter. There's no "good" decision to be made.
>
>> _____
>> / ' / T
>> ,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
>> (_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 |
|