Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: David <farookdas@picknowl.com.au>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.frank.mccoy
Subject: Re: Hello.
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:51:09 +0930
Organization: Anywhere but loose 4
Message-ID: <r18826d20cjkn2s5q0qmjqr384gih5187f@4ax.com>
References: <2r6826phj92eujqen8ldadn3j6g4ohmpkq@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 36
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70ddb25b.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=ikNWRc2^@fifMO9kN]`\TcL?0kYOcDh@ji=VFiPm?<[eh0f1VnMBQDfD[m_EibfHnll7[_\IQ03Qm
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.frank.mccoy:1062
[Default] On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:08:18 -0500, Frank McCoy
<mccoyf@millcomm.com> typed:
>I'm back ... Sort of.
>
>Sorry I can't talk about the case, except that it's still ongoing.
>Judge Sands heard the case ... And hasn't made any rulings yet; either
>on the motions or on the verdict itself.
>
>As you can see, I just got permission to use the Internet, Usenet, and
>Email. I can't post stories and will not be discussing either stories
>or the case. Sorry. Any posts or comments to me about either will be
>ignored. Still, things are better than they were.
>
>I *WILL* correct ONE misconception I read in catching up however:
>
>I have *always* held that my stories are legal.
>That being the basis of my entire defense.
>
>Some people might say they are illegal, because of various laws.
>So ... Ponder this:
>Was it illegal for Rosa Parks to sit in the front of the bus?
>Or ... Was the law itself illegal?
>
>Sorry, but further than that, I won't be entering the discussion.
>;-{
>
>Wish I could.
Welcome back, Frank. I agree that the law requiring Rosa Parks to sit at
the rear of the bus was illegal. I won't tempt you further.
--
David
No email replies please.
You are the only person to ever get this message.
|
|